COURTROOM OBSERVATION ONE 3
Courtroom Observation One The court case that was observed was trying to decide whether or not a woman's parental rights should be terminated for her children. The judge presiding was Honorable Scott Sparks. The three issues dealt with hearsay, relevance, and a compound question. Each issue will be analyzed with the Federal Rules of Evidence to see if the judge's ruling was appropriate.
First Evidentiary Issue The first …show more content…
At this point in the case, the plaintiff started to talk about the woman's husband, saying that he was no where to found. This caused the defendant's lawyer to raise an objection of relevance because the husband was not the matter questioned in this case and should not be discussed. The judge disagreed and said that the husband could be talked about because it was something that needed to be included since the case was about whether or not the woman could provide for her children and the husband's absence affected