Crime And Punishment Rhetorical Analysis

Words: 546
Pages: 3

Empirical Over Anecdotal Crime control may differ wherever you are, but is it okay to enforce your restrictions on visitors from other nations? In the article “Time to assert American Values” from New York Times, the author explains his/her opposition about foreign punishments on American citizens. On the other hand in the article “Rough Justice A caning In Singapore Stirs Up a Fierce Debate About Crime and Punishment” by Alejandro Reyes, the author uses a series of facts and observations to inform the reader on the topic and why these foreign punishments are, in fact, not inhumane. After carefully analyzing the two texts, the reader realizes that the article “Rough Justice A Caning In Singapore Stirs Up A Fierce Debate About Crime and Punishment” …show more content…
The author states, “An inhumane practice that ought not to exist anywhere” (“Time to Assert” 179). This fact is strictly an opinion, that most people find unacceptable. The only source used in this hasty generalization is the author himself, which leaves the reader to ponder the fact that he may be the minority in the situation. The author goes on to explain his disbelief in the punishment by using more opinions with no actually sources. The author claims, “they are committing an act of cultural arrogance” (“Time to Assert American Values” 179). By saying this, the author is also committing “cultural arrogance” by not accepting the fact that Singapore has different crime laws than the United States. The author is truly playing the odds against himself, causing the reader to second guess his