Consequently, when it comes to policies and procedures, these individuals are the ones that understand them the best. So, for the courts to be regulators and oversee the law enforcement officers will place undue strain on both entities. We all know that both the courts and law enforcement have so many various duties to fulfill, so to add the regulatory duty to the courts of law enforcement is just in my opinion too much. As mentioned, a better alternative is to allow the law enforcement professionals to do what they do best, put forth their own knowledge and assist the courts, while the courts do not necessarily regulate them, the court just ensures from a more administrative standpoint that laws, rights, and statutes are followed, and I agree. Moreover, this could not only save the unneeded tension between the two entities but also make each entity aware of their own responsibilities and move forward to a more effective and systematic …show more content…
My own thoughts on this stem from the fact that I believe to have a successful system, we need not to keep information bottled up to ourselves, and we need to assist one another. Therefore, by implementing systemic facts based network we can have up-to-date information and data that can come from all over the United States that can aid with the court system. Also, this may in fact aid in law enforcement as well in the opposite direction. We have the ability now, with technology, to develop a system that can sort, analyze, and calculate, etc. data that can be informative for judges, and specifically, Crespo mentioned the issues with warrants and searches and seizures. I believe that this is a great way for judges to see the end result of what happens when they sign that warrant, as well as for law enforcement to see what was potentially seized at a previous residence at an earlier date. I see this as a technological advance that can serve the justice system in an immense