Are Searches And Seizures Are Legally Performed

Submitted By Jazzie380
Words: 2389
Pages: 10
Open Document
Are Searches and Seizures Legally Performed
Shayna L. Alexander
Saint Leo University

The topic of whether searches and seizures are legally performed can raise major issues. There are several of people that will view this in different perspectives. Searches and seizures are legally performed in some cases, but there is some where the search and seizures was done inappropriately causing the case to be dismissed. Searches and seizures laws are sometimes misunderstood by people because there are hidden clauses that people do not understand. This can and will lead them to sometimes helping law enforcement officials prosecute themselves of crimes that they could have gotten out of. I will elaborate on how the searches and seizures are legally performed, including how they are not legally performed, and the Amendments that are tied into searches and seizures.
First, I will elaborate on what searches and seizures really are. Searches are an invasion of privacy and can be applied to several doctrines like the trespass doctrine, which is the Fourth Amendment doctrine that requires physical intrusions into a “constitutionally protected area” to qualify as a search(Samaha, 2012,2008) . And the privacy doctrine was a doctrine that was first suggested in a dissent in a Prohibition Era case(Samaha, 2012,2008, p. 53). The privacy doctrine is a doctrine that holds that the Fourth Amendment protects persons, not places when the persons have an exception of privacy that society is prepared to recognize(Samaha, 2012,2008, p. 564). However these doctrines all have some type of similarity because they all include regards of searches. The searches that are conducted have to be done appropriately to be upheld in the court of law. But with the privacy doctrine it ties into a person’s privacy whether it is they are violating it or just intruding in on it. For example, placing a wire tap on a telephone to listen at the conversation can be a violation if no search warrant was issued. This means that the evidence heard can and will not be allowed in court because it was obtained illegally. This is something that has taken place, like the case on Olmstead v. U.S., this case is where the phone was wired and there was no search warrant in place for this. But the Fourth Amendment does not protect on all invasions of privacy, because some can be justified in the court of law under reasonable guidelines. So this all falls under whether it is performed legally or not. The legal aspect is if the search was done in the correct manner and that all guidelines where followed, because it does not take but one screw up to have the whole search thrown out by the courts. A search can also be done under the plain view doctrine because this applies when an officer sees something illegal and seize it. This can be done because I just witness this type of incident, where law enforcement officials stopped this vehicle and when the officer was talking to the driver he saw drug paraphernalia on the floor of the back seat. He asked all of them to step out of the car and asked them were there any drugs or weapons located inside the car. They answered no! But there was drugs inside so he did not have to have a search warrant because it was in plain view of the officer so he seized it and placed them all under arrest until they admitted as to who drugs it belonged to. The other plain view doctrine applies if they are searching and for instance a gun or knife is laying on the floor of the apartment they can seize it because it was in plain view and they did not have to open nor search through any items to retrieve this. But the plain view doctrine can be very tricking to some because the use of telescopes and airplanes can sometime be a violation of the person Fourth Amendment rights. At has also been stated that the Fourth Amendment does not protect what officers can discover through their ordinary sense in public places(Samaha, 2012,2008, p. 71). And with abandon
Show More

Related Documents: Are Searches And Seizures Are Legally Performed

Criminal Law

Chapter 1, Page 22, Question 5: What are some important differences between civil law and criminal law? Civil Law is the branch of law that deals with all private and public rights while criminal law is the branch of law that punishes wrong acts against the public. 2) What is the Bill of Rights? What freedoms do the First Amendment Guarantee? The Bill of Rights is the first ten amendments to the U.S. Constitution. The first ten amendments protect individuals against different types of interference…

Words 3797 - Pages 16

The Importance Of Criminal Law

The law enforcemenr arm of the State can detain people suspected of criminal actMq', can EVIDENCE ACT I 995 - SECT l4l - Criminat proceedings: standard of proof interrogate, can lay charges and can bring matters before the courts. Given the dispariry of power beween an indMdual and the State it is important that the State power be limited through the imposition of standards on law enforcement officials. Several laws detaii how the police should conduct themselves in regard to criminal law matters…

Words 1649 - Pages 7

Substantive Criminal Law

of the substantive criminal law of each country. This paper will compare the substantive criminal law between the three countries. Furthermore, this paper will explain how the definitions of criminal responsibility differ between Australia, Canada, and the U.S. The similarities and differences of substantive law as they appear in the legal traditions of the three countries will also be looked at and identified. This paper will also explain the effects of public and private law within the countries…

Words 1040 - Pages 5

Criminal Law Essay

and it was a Heat of Passion crime (Boling,2012). The killing would ordinarily be murder, but because of the mitigating factor (Paul found his wife in bed with his partner Larry), Paul did not have the requisite state of mind for murder (Criminal law for the Criminal Justice Professional, 2003-2009). However, Paul is also guilty of 1st degree murder for killing Susan. Paul is guilty of this because he had plenty of time to cool off, in fact he drank a beer while watching football. It was therefore…

Words 741 - Pages 3

Vagueness In Criminal Law

Vagueness in criminal law is a “declaration that a law is invalid because it is not sufficiently clear”. Whereas, the due process clause promised that before “depriving a citizen of life, liberty or property, the government must follow fair procedures” ("Vagueness doctrine | Wex Legal Dictionary / Encyclopedia | LII / Legal Information Institute," n.d.). ‘Constitutional rule requires criminal laws to state explicitly and definitely what conduct is punishable’("Due Process | Wex Legal Dictionary /…

Words 283 - Pages 2

A Note On Criminal Law

do not have the ability to change the guidelines of a testamentary, and the judge states, “I cannot find any support for the argument that the respondent’s succession to the property should be avoided because of his criminal act, when the laws are silent”(152). Therefore the criminal act and the testamentary should be handled as separate means in the courts, and the courts can simply not interfere with a dead man’s final testamentary. Public policy does not specifically define what should happen…

Words 379 - Pages 2

Essay on Criminal Law

the course of justice 1. s143 (ii) Attempted murder 2. s283 (iii) Assaults 3. in s222 (b) General attempt provisions In the absence of a specific attempt provision, these general provisions make it an offence to attempt any offence in the criminal code. (i) Attempting an indictable offence 4. s552 1. Any person who attempts to commit an indictable offence is guilty of a crime 1. The sentence is half of that of the principal offence, or 14 years where life is the sentence (ii) Attempting…

Words 4697 - Pages 19

Scots Criminal Law

Causation in terms of Scots criminal Law refers to whether the act or omission of a persons conduct caused the particular harm or damage. It is fundamental that in all result crimes causation must be established. However, by itself causation of a particular event is not sufficient enough to form legal liability meaning it has to be combined with both mens rea and actus reus to prove criminal responsibility per result crime. In criminal liability causation is separated into two parts; factual and…

Words 1173 - Pages 5

Needlesness In Criminal Law

agreed the majority should have applied the Katz test along with the historical trespass analysis. As the NACDL pointed out, “Justice Alito would have applied the privacy test instead of the trespass analysis stating that ‘the court reliance on the law of trespass will present particularly vexing problems involving surveillance that is carried out by making electronic, as opposed to physical, contact with the item to be tracked.’” The NACDL endorsed similar concerns (non-trespass surveillance and…

Words 872 - Pages 4

Questions On Criminal Law

grounds of appeal, it should be sent to the Crown Court where you were convicted or sentenced. The Crown Court will then copy all the documents used at the trial and send them, with Form NG, to the Criminal Appeal Office, which provides administrative support to the Court of Appeal. Contact details for the Criminal Appeal Office are given at paragraph D below. If you wish to apply for legal aid for a barrister or solicitor advocate to represent you at the appeal hearing if the judge gives you permission…

Words 3830 - Pages 16