Critique of “The Myth of the Millennials”
After analyzing Edwin W. Koc’s article, “The Myth of the Millennials,” he demonstrates disbelief that millennial students are more than “self-indulgent, entitled, and dependent as adults and employees.” His point specifies that millennial parents emphasize their children’s needs first by often working more than one job, these millennial parents ensured that their children could engage in their individual desires. However, instead of helping them, millennial students and workers grow up with a false notion of reality; they erroneously believe that life is all about them, which creates problems in the workplace. The …show more content…
Carol Elam, Dr. Terry Stratton, and Denise D. Gibson, Ph. D. reiterate: The Millennial generation is different from previous generations because they are conventionally motivated and respectful, structured rule followers, protected and sheltered, cooperative and team – oriented, talented achievers, and confident and optimistic about their futures, all of which have implications for educators at all levels. (Elam, Stratton, & Gibson, 2007, P. 22). Also in the article, “Welcoming a New Generation to College: The Millennial Students,” Dr. Elam, Dr. Stratton, and Gibson, Ph. D. articulate:
The Millennial generation will feel the pressure to achieve goals and greater self worth. Millennial students will have high expectations for their own success as undergraduates. As such, they may also have clearly defined objectives, and will actively seek help in accomplishing their goals. Failing to do so may render the university and its faculty as accountable to both the student and their parents. This is particularly relevant to admission counselors towards whom students, and their parents, may be quick to claim unfairness in selection decisions. Since non-acceptance to a particular college or university is an obvious reality, anticipating responses to students and parents’ high expectations is important for both high school counselors (who may provide letters of recommendation and evaluation) and college recruiters. (Elam, Stratton, & Gibson, 2007, P. 23) In sum, my