Culpable Driving Essay

Submitted By marinkarlos
Words: 1625
Pages: 7
Open Document
Assessment task one: Short answer problem.
Short answer problem one:
Steve experiences occasional sudden unconsciousness as a result of a work place incident several years ago; resulting in a serious head injury. Over the last 4 years, he has unexpectedly lost consciousness on 5 occasions. On each occasion, he was at home and the loss of consciousness lasted between 30 seconds and one minute. On 26th September, 2011, he was driving his car when he lost consciousness for the 6th time while stationary at an intersection. His car drifted across the intersection and hit a pedestrian who was lawfully crossing to the other side. Steve has been charged with culpable driving causing death under s. 318 Crimes Act 1958 (Vic). Discuss Steve’s criminal liability including any relevant defences.
Introduction: Culpable driving
The statutory charge of ‘Culpable driving causing death’ pursuant to the Crimes Act 1958 (Vic)(“the Act”)’1 is a very serious offence, it is categorised as an indictable offence; if found guilty Steve may face a maximum 20 year term of imprisonment or a level three fine, or alternatively; both.2 Pursuant to ss 318(2)(a)–(d) of the Act (“Sections A-D”); to be found guilty and subsequently convicted the jury must find that; beyond reasonable doubt (“BRD”) the death of the pedestrian was the result of Steve driving in a manner considered to be:3
a) Reckless;4
b) Negligent or; 5
c) Due to Steve being under the influence of drugs and/or alcohol to the extent of being incapable of having proper control of the vehicle.6
It is also worth noting that as the charge suggests in order for Steve to be found liable for Culpable driving causing death, pursuant to either form or manner provided for in Sections A-D the driving must have actually resulted in the death of the pedestrian.7
Defences available
There are a number of avenues in which Steve can seek to avoid liability, these defences are:
Lack of recklessness;
Lack of negligence or lack of gross negligence; or
Factual disputes;
The success of these defences; like in all criminal cases turns to the facts of the case and the evidence provided.
Important points relating to the facts of the case
The facts provide that Steve has a serious condition that has rendered him unconscious on numerous occasions. There are no inferences made that suggest that Steve was speeding, precluded from driving or was driving whilst under the influence of drugs and/or alcohol.
It is important to note that the facts of the case do not state that the pedestrian actually died, nevertheless for the purpose of this discussion an inference will be made that the pedestrian died as it is the most likely probability considering the charge. There are a number of issues that must be considered before determining whether or not Steve is criminally liable for culpable driving causing death.
Reckless culpable driving
Firstly, one must determine what form of culpable driving Steve likely to be charged with. In R v McGrath,8 while referring to the wording provided in s 318(2)(a) of the Act (“Section A”) Callaway JA noted that ‘the worst class would almost certainly involve the first kind of culpability described in s 318(2)(a), namely a conscious and unjustifiable disregard of a substantial risk of causing death.’ 9 Justice Callaway is referring to intentional/voluntary nature of the apparent disregard of the substantial risk of causing death, he also correctly noted that ‘the state of mind described in s 318(2)(a) is the same as for reckless murder’10
Pursuant to the High Court decision of R v Crabbe,11 recklessness is to be substantiated subjectively test whereby it is necessary to prove BRD that the accused engaged in a manner or performed an act with the subjective knowledge that the consequences would probably result in the death or grievous bodily harm (“GBH”) to another person, but voluntarily disregarded this probable risk and continued to act. The High Court went further
Show More

Related Documents: Culpable Driving Essay

Halliday V Canes Law

argued by some that the way in which Scots criminal law draws the distinction between murder and culpable homicide is unsatisfactory. Some say that the scope of murder is too narrow and that the scope of culpable homicide is too wide. It is necessary to discuss how the crimes of murder and culpable homicide are treated in Scots law, by analysing how the law is applied in cases involving murder and culpable homicide. Macdonald states “murder is constituted by any wilful act causing the destruction of…

Words 2242 - Pages 9

Successful Criminal Defense Lawyer Case Study

Key Factors That Make a Successful Criminal Defense Lawyer Numerous individuals trust that a decent criminal attorney is one who is forceful and, maybe, even pushy with the prosecutor or the judge. This conviction may even incorporate the thought that an effective criminal legal advisor utilizes showy behavior and double dealing to win in court. This can't be further from reality. Most likely, this observation is affected, in any event halfway, by the numerous prime-time American TV programs…

Words 622 - Pages 3

Serrano-Rebert Case Study

gang as was the teacher the gang members harmed. Alonso Serrano-Serra’s presence there that evening did not result in harm for the teacher in anyway nor did Alonso even know the gang members planned such an act that evening when he got in the car. Driving that car and waiting at the door were tangential and inconsequential for the teacher and are not within the scope of “assistance” in persecution barred by the statute. Mortified by what he knew the gang members had done, Alonso called the police,…

Words 548 - Pages 3

Argumentative Essay On Drinking And Driving

After a night of partying involving consumption of some alcohol, the incriminated decided to drive his friends home, albeit he kenned that his conveyance was not mechanically yare. After 10 to 20 min Keyser, who had only had only been driving for seven weeks as a licensed driver, drove erratically, weaving in and out of traffic, tailgating and endeavoring to pass other conveyances without signaling, despite steady oncoming lane of traffic, side -swiped a first car and crashed into a second one. The…

Words 1022 - Pages 5

Legal studies exam revision Essay

Legal EXAM Revision Section A Q1- Definition with example i) Committal proceedings: Held in magistrate’s court determines whether there is sufficient evidence to support a conviction in a higher court. If yes it will be sent to country or supreme and a committal mention date will be set ii) Strict Liability Crime: Crimes where mens rea is not required by the prosecution. E.g. parking fines iii) 3 differences between criminal and civil law Civil Criminal Concerned with Rights and responsibilities…

Words 2208 - Pages 9

Scots Criminal Law

In the common law of evidence it is where there is the tendency of a given item of evidence to prove or disprove one of the legal elements of the case. Under this part of causation the result must have been caused by a culpable act and there must be no novus actus interveniens- a new intervening act which breaks the causal connection between the wrong committed by the defendant and the subsequent happenings which relieves the defendant from being responsible for the happenings…

Words 1173 - Pages 5

Assignment: Criminal Law and Reasonable Belief Essay

requirement is that the conduct be caused by the conscious exercise of the power of choice. It could be said that in some cases the physical opportunity may be removed such in this case for Logan given that Patrick the driver of the motor vehicle was driving at high speeds around tight bends, which caused Logan to land on Lizzy’s lap would make Logan’s actions involuntary. However, the court will need to determine whether Logan been ‘flung’ was an involuntary act. The prosecution must prove that Logan’s…

Words 3016 - Pages 13

Essay about Mens Rea and Recklessness

completely unaware any risk created, he can be objectively reckless. This caused injustice and gave rise to a great deal of criticism. Perhaps for the injustice caused by Caldwell, Caldwell only limited to offences such as criminal damage and dangerous driving. In other areas of criminal law, recklessness continued to apply pre-Caldwell meaning.11 The final blow to Caldwell recklessness was dealt in RvG. The House of Lords overturned Caldwell. The Lords relied on ‘compelling legal considerations’, namely…

Words 1598 - Pages 7

Essay Paradise Lost

The media lies Try to spend a day without the media and its devices. Starting from the morning, don’t watch any morning shows on TV and don’t read a newspaper. While walking to the bus stop or driving to work, neither look at any advertisement nor listen to the radio. Even at work, don’t watch YouTube or any news video clip on Yahoo. After work, even during dinner, don’t turn on the TV. It would be undeniably excruciating for anyone to undergo— I personally wouldn’t dare to. This phenomenon…

Words 1569 - Pages 7

Moffitt's Adolescent-Offending: A Psychological Analysis

Laurence Steinberg formulated a theoretical model that offers an intriguing neurological explanation for Moffitt’s adolescent-limited offending. The model is based on a collection of empirical studies from developmental psychology and neuroscience. Steinberg (2008, 2010) hypothesized that the brain areas associated with the development of reward seeking and impulsivity, and self-regulation of behavior follow different timelines of development. These differences in the neurological timetables help…

Words 1590 - Pages 7