al did time samples at spawning aggregation locations in Spencer Gulf, off of South Australia. Their sampling as completed between 1000 – 1700 hours over 24 scuba dives in May-June 2000 and 2001. Their trial consisted of 18 females and 29 males in 17 trials. They did an observational study of the interactions between these individuals as well as egg and DNA collection. In the females, they would collect the eggs either directly from the female or from the deposition site. In all participants, they would take tissue samples with a hole punch. With this method of tissue collection, the researchers did not note any change in cuttlefish behavior. Under natural mating conditions, there were 49 observed mating attempts with 18 female, 43% (21 attempts) were refused. The remaining matings were accepted, 13 paired, 1o unpaired, and two sneaker mating. Naud’s conclusion was that there seemed to be an apparent randomness of which females selected to mate …show more content…
As concluded by Naud, there is a level of apparent randomness when it comes to females selecting males to mate with. So do a side-by-side trial, Hall and Naud’s experiment revolved around removing human interaction, so they do have factors to consider, but the subjects are under less stress from outside and unexpected sources. Schell’s experiment doesn’t necessarily revolve around removing those stresses as there is a lot more handling of the subjects, and manipulation of the environment that they’re