DACA Argumentative Analysis

Words: 690
Pages: 3

What if a kid was left alone in a country they have never been in before, doesn’t know the language, or even people there. How would they feel? Heartbroken? Lost? Many of the Dreamers wake up daily and have uncertainty about their future and are worried if what is giving them a reason to be in the United States is going to be ended. Dreamers as they are called, had no control over immigrating to the United States and only know America as their home.DACA should stay and continue to help those young adults that do no harm to anyone.
Take in mind that yes, DACA keeps recipients from being deported through deferred action, which has to be approved every two years, but they don’t get a path to citizenship. In addition, President Obama did not also have the constitutional right to establish this program nor fund it as an executive action. In addition, it was also an overreach of the Obama administration, but it has grown to be a program where young adults can get better opportunities in school, jobs, and life in general.
The University of Chicago periodically gave surveys to students in 2015, and in one of the polls of high skilled immigration, about 95% of economists who answered thought that the average American would be better off with more immigrants. The other 5% were uncertain.
…show more content…
In the article “Why ending DACA is so unprecedented” the author, Dara Lind, states that Even though DACA never officially legalized anyone, ending it would be, in a way, the biggest “illegalization” of immigrants in American history. It is also most likely that if DACA ends and Dreamers are sent back to their home countries their parents are most likely to go with them and in addition to that, The Bulk Of Studies have found that low-skilled immigrants fulfil jobs that Americans don’t want or that are low-paying and losing over 690,000-people is obviously going to harm the