The “Dark” Ages were a period in time when Europe was getting conquered by Barbarians when they invaded, a time when there was a deficit in learning, and a time where many technological advances were made. The barbarian invasions were defended by large …show more content…
They might think this because there were so many bad things that happened and they might have thought that the bad thing overruled the good things about the “Dark” Ages. According to Document C, “In the same year the heathen broke in upon the Christians at many points, but more than twelve thousand of them died” (Abbey’s Monks, 6-7). These are good points, however, readers should disagree. Even if 12,000 people died, Europe recovered and prospered afterwards. This is not enough evidence to support that the “Dark” Ages were just bad. Look at Document B. It is showing that the “Dark” Ages also had great things about it, like technological advances, population increases, and also triple the available farmland!
In conclusion, the “Dark” Ages cannot be called either light or dark, but can certainly be call both. Because in Europe, there was a deficit in learning, they were brilliant because they had very many technological advances, and lastly, it was dark because there were many barbarian invasions, and lots of violence and bloodshed, the “Dark” Ages were both dark and