Do you know what the differences between samurais and knights were? Samurais were warriors that came from Japan, but knights were also warriors that came from Europe. Samurais and knights were different because of their training and armor, honor and death, and social position.
To start off, their training and armor of the samurai and knights were different. In document C, it states that people in Japan fully train to become samurais at age 14, but people in Europe fully train to become knights at age 21. This suggests that samurais fully train earlier than knights. This shows who finishes their training first and who does second. In document D, it states, a samurai's armor is projectile-based, but a knight's armor is bash-and-slash. This evidence explains the main uses of their armor. This evidence proves that their fighting style is different. As a result, the armor of samurais and knights and the way they train are different.…show more content… In document F, it states that samurais accepted death while knights were worried about their sins and wanted God's forgiveness before the end of life. This evidence proves that samurais and knights react differently to death. This shows knights want God's forgiveness before their death, but samurais accept death. In document E, it states, samurais have the duty to serve one master, but knights have loyalty to lord, courage, & honor. This evidence proves that samurais and knights are loyal in different ways. This shows when they are loyal serve one master while knights are loyal to lord, have courage & honor fighting. To sum up, samurais accept death but knights are worried about the end of
