De-Extinction Is Immoral, And Bad Science All Around

Words: 319
Pages: 2
Open Document
The counterpoint is more persuasive and has better-supported facts. It is addressed clearly and is well-written. Although the point also uses fluent facts and is somewhat persuasive, the counterpoint is stronger. The counterpoint uses different ways to persuade the readers into thinking, "De-Extinction Is Immoral, and Bad Science All Around". After reading the 8 paragraphs, I think the same way.

The counterpoint author uses a popular story, Frankenstein, which grabs the reader's attention because most people know of the story and have watched the movie. The story interests the reader and makes them want to keep reading. In paragraph 8 the author states, " Make-believe can become reality, thanks to research on de-extinction" (counterpoint
Show More

Related Documents: De-Extinction Is Immoral, And Bad Science All Around

Sources of Ethics Essay

TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0- JOHN STEINER AND GEORGE STEINER SIX PRIMARY SOURCES OF ETHICS: 6 1- Religion: 6 2- Genetic Inheritance: 8 3- Philosophical Systems: 8 4- Cultural Experience: 8 5- The Legal System: 9 6- Codes of Conduct: 9 2.0- EXPLANATION OF THE SOURCES OF ETHICS: 10 2.1- RELIGION: 10 Teaching business ethics 12 2.11- Impact Of Religiosity: 13 2.12- Ethics Of Islam: 14 Nature of Islamic Ethics 17 The Human-Environment Relationship: 20 The Sustainable…

Words 20200 - Pages 81