Descartes Mind Vs Body

Words: 1250
Pages: 5

Are the mind and the body separate? If so, is the mind non-material/non-physical? These are questions that famous philosopher Descartes sought out to answer, and he theorized that the mind and the body are separate, and are two different, distinct aspects of humans. This conclusion Descartes came to raises many other questions concerning the mind. One may ask: if the mind is a being of which does not depend on any other being to exist, then does the mind still exist after death? It is believed that Descartes went through the trouble to come up with his thesis about the mind was to provide a rational basis for the soul’s immortality (if the soul and the mind are one in the same). Although he makes a good case for immortality, another question could arise from Descartes’ thesis: if the mind/soul is non-physical, where would it go after death? Because it is not physical, it would be nonsensical to assume our soul would “go” to heaven, because it does not exist in a certain place to begin with. There are also many other issues that arise from Descartes’s thesis. If mind-body dualism is …show more content…
However, if the concept of free will exists in the human brain, then addiction, mental disorders, diseases, and anything that is able to change the way in which the brain functions would ultimately limit the free will that one has. Because there are so many factors that could harbor a person’s free will, then shouldn’t we place a person with no tangible evidence of a weakness of the brain on a higher level? If these people have total free will and are aware of every decision that they make, then are these people being punished properly for their actions? If free will exists, it could also prove that there is a predisposition for human beings to be evil, as anyone that is fully in charge of their actions would have to be evil to be able to commit murder, rape, or any other heinous