However, in Meditation I, he takes on a skeptical view on the basis that the senses have deceived him on some occasions. Thus, Descartes conjectures that we cannot be certain of knowledge that is based upon the testimony of our …show more content…
For example, in Meditation I, Descartes reflects on the fact that he is “seated by the fire, attired in a winter dressing gown...” (Descartes, 115) He cannot abstain from believing that he possess his hands and body unless he likens himself to madmen. Nevertheless, once again he turns to a skeptical argument by considering the possibility of dreaming; the perceptions of his hand and body are very much like the ones he usually has in dreams. This is the first hyperbolic doubt which calls into doubt even the most evident of the beliefs we get from our senses. He claims to “see [obviously] that there are no [sure signs] by which [being awake can be distinguished from being asleep]” (Descartes, 115). Dreams are as veridical as reality, that it is questionable whether we can disregard that he is dreaming and that all of his perceptions are