Musladin & Escobedo v. Illinois. In Carey v. Musladin, the family of the victim wore pins with the victim's face on them and the defense asked if they could take them off because it was prejudicial but the judge denied the motion. After appealing his conviction the Appellate Court agreed with them saying he was being denied his Due Process. In Escobedo v. Illinois, Escobedo was suspected of killing his brother-in-law and was arrested and then another man was arrested and then he was released. When he was rearrested, they interrogated him without a lawyer even though he asked for his. He made self incriminating statements which they used in court and he was convicted. After he appealed twice, the U.S. Supreme Court agreed that under his Sixth Amendment Rights it was not fair to