The presenter did their speech on bees. Their vocal tone during his speech was good. The information, he gathered, on bees were good and interesting. He also gave out a personal experience towards bees, saying he is deathly afraid of them.
The presenter’s purpose of his speech is to inform the audience about bees and he thoroughly talked about what he will present. He gave out the topics or a overview of that he will be presenting. It was very good because that is his speech outline to help guide him what he will be talking about next instead wandering around aimlessly. His attention getter was very effective and simple. A simple buzzing noise flying around the room and landing on a few students got the audience wondering what his speech will be about. As he was conducting his speech, his information was good and I was convinced until he that hit that one part. He seemed unsure about citing that second source was and switched between those two from “.com” to “.org”. The source itself is not credible as well. A good source to cite could be from “.gov” or “.edu” would be more effective. He also could have double checked his sources ahead of time. The presenter’s visual aid was simple, but it helped showed the audience what he was presenting. It was very easy to understand and his visuals were funny as well, so it really captured the audience’s attention.…show more content… They gave us a quick overview of what they will present and the main points of what he will cover during his speech. His organization was very clear and easy to follow up on. His transition was done nicely, as he introduced his next main points to discussed. As his speech came to the end, he did a very good job on going over what he presented to us. He ended his presentation with a little thought for the audience and it was nice way to end his
