As the villain of this play, it was Don John's duty to not look as though he shared everyone's view. In doing so, he had to direct his attitude towards the characters that would have the largest ripple effect. He chose both Claudio and Don Pedro for varying reasons other than their original attitudes. He selected Claudio, because Claudio was the character that was receiving the most attention by professing his love for Hero to his peers. This enabled many of the characters of this play to loose a sense of happiness later on. On the other hand, Don Pedro was chosen for reasons other than Don John's bitter resentment of his power and social status, but because of his role as a catalyst in making happiness occur. Don Pedro was willing to go above and beyond to bring two different couples together even though he still ended up remaining unmarried at the play's end. By choosing Claudio and Don Pedro to target a negative attitude regarding Hero, Don John was able to deploy his plan to destroy their happiness. Much Ado About Nothing by William Shakespeare contained an antagonist, Don John, who employed the rhetorical appeal to pathos in an effort to disrupt other characters' happiness. In order to do so, he constructed evil plans for Claudio and Don Pedro to encounter. Although, despite Don John's great efforts, in the end, the character's happiness overcame Don John's sinister plans, and “...John is ta’en in flight,/ And brought with armed men back to Messina.”