Douglas Burnham And Papanderopoulos: An Analysis

Words: 1331
Pages: 6

Freedom comes in different forms when described in different types of situation. Whether, it is to be physically free from jail or internally having the ability to say whatever a person wants to another individual, whatever the type, freedom approaches in various of forms that focuses on the idea that humans have the ability to be free to do or say things. Fatalism, however, expresses the idea that God has predetermined humans past, present, and future while also determining who is going to heaven or hell before the birth of a human, making life inevitable. There is no logical evidence that supports the claim that fatalism is real because their ideas on fate are proven to be changable through freedom; fatalism turns God’s goodwill to that …show more content…
Authors Douglas Burnham and George Papanderopoulos mentions in Existentialism, “freedom entails something like responsibility, for myself and for my actions.” explaining that humans are entitled to their responsibility if they have done something wrong. For example, if a man was hungry and had the action to eat an orange to withstand his hunger, wouldn’t eating be considered his free will? He had the action to face his hunger by eating an orange than not to eat the orange and starve; revealing that he had the ability to choose his own actions for his own responsibility for himself. If an unknown force from fate told the man to not eat the orange and starve to death, wouldn’t that contradict the meaning of why the man was born? It wouldn’t make sense if God allowed a human to starve and die if they are the ones controlling the …show more content…
As Kevin Timpe mentions in his article Freedom, “My body and its characteristics, my circumstances in a historical world, and my past, all weigh upon freedom”. The author expresses his idea on freedom that an individual has the ability to change his/her body for their own future appearance. Changes in a human’s appearance can alter in different methods to change a human’s appearance such as exercising and gaining muscles, eating more to gain weight, plastic surgery, getting piercings, getting a tattoo, and eating less to lose weight. It’s under the person’s freedom and responsibility to do whatever they would like to do with their own bodies because their bodies belong to themselves. The freedom to modify your own body contradicts the idea that fate determines an individual’s appearance because a human’s body belongs to themselves. Fate wouldn’t be able to make a person to get plastic surgery or get a tattoo because God was the creator of the human to be different from the rest. Wouldn’t that make getting plastic surgery or a tattoo one’s free will? Freedom conveys the idea that fate does not decide to change humans appearances because it’s up to a person’s free will to make modifications to their own