During the murder scene, Hyde tasted “delight from every blow”, but he also felt “a cold thrill of terror” (Stevenson 74). This terror is out of place for the character of Hyde because he is supposed to be unaffected by the social constructs of society. As Ferrer-Medina explains, “Because he represents wilderness, Hyde feels no fear, no commitment to propriety or decorum” (9). Therefore, this terror felt by Hyde is directly from Jekyll when he realizes what has happened. The testimony that Jekyll wrote is also evidence that they are able to influence each other. When writing the note, Jekyll was certain that Hyde would destroy it before Utterson could receive it (Stevenson 81). With their connected memories, this would be an easy feat for Hyde, yet the note was safely delivered to Utterson, showing Jekyll’s success in influencing Hyde to keep the testimony safe. Because of their ability to influence each other, neither Jekyll nor Hyde can be solely placed on one side of spectrum even though they are more inclined to lean one way or the other because neither of them are purely good nor purely evil (Hustis 8). On a broader scale, this essentially means that society can be neither purely good nor purely evil, but somewhere in