dredd scott Essay

Submitted By cito1196
Words: 668
Pages: 3
Open Document
Ruben Ramirez
Period 6
12-1-13
Dred Scott v. Sanford In the case Dred Scott v. Sanford, Dred Scott lost but a majority based arguments on why he lost on assumptions and misinterpretations of certain founding documents. The people based their argument on the fact that the founders of the constitution did not mention anything about African Americans being considered property because they had always used African Americans as chattel although Thomas Jefferson had mentioned that it was wrong for the British king to be using slaves in the colonies. Jefferson had used the word men instead of slaves to make everyone seem equal but this was deleted from the Declaration of the Independence. In both the Declaration of Independence and the constitution there is nowhere that says an African American can’t be a citizen and that they have to be a slave or a person’s property. There was much debate whether Dred Scott should be considered a citizen or not but according to Chief Justice Taney, the argument was not valid because everyone knew that African Americans were not considered as part of the phrase “We the People” in the Declaration of Independence. Taney believed that African Americans could never become citizens because the phrase of the Declaration of Independence, “All men are created equal,” excluded all African Americans. It sounds as if Taney had thought that everyone in the colonies wanted to be pro-slavery. Scott was not able to sue in court because the court said that he was not a citizen because his race was not part of the culture that had adopted the constitution. They used the constitution to defend slaves from being free because they were considered property and the constitution gives people to protect their property. The conclusion that Taney had given during the trial was based on the belief that the people who framed and adopted the constitution into their lives were racist and believed that slaves should be considered property. When the Articles of Confederation were implemented into the colonies, any person who was born in the states was automatically considered a citizen. However some people thought that African Americans shouldn’t be able to become citizens because the Declaration of Independence says we the people and since Taney said this excluded African Americans people automatically assumed that the phrase “we the people,” did not include African Americans when in reality it included all people not just a certain group of people. Abraham Lincoln was not pleased with the dred scott case and stated, “Chief
Show More

Related Documents: dredd scott Essay

The Dredd Scott Case: The Cause Of The Civil War

The Dredd Scott case was a contributing factor to the Civil War, but it was not the direct cause of the war. Abolitionist had many breakthrough advances pushing toward the goal of ending it once and for all. Some key advances in the abolitionist quest for nonviolent means to end slavery were: William Lloyd Garrison organized publications and speaking tours, the infamous slave Nat Turner sparked small rebellions and brought awareness to the lengths the slaves would go in order to maintain freedom…

Words 272 - Pages 2

The Reconstruction Era: Conflict between the North and the South Essay

Opening Statement: The Reconstruction era was a period of tremendous conflict between the North and the South. Many argued about how the Reconstruction of this nation should be accomplished and which legislation could safely benefit the well being of people in the North and the South. The disagreements between the many new and old political parties during the reconstruction era led to a new battle called the Reconstruction. Ultimately the South did not “win” the reconstruction. Argument #1 An…

Words 528 - Pages 3

History Paper 2

Southerners to withdraw the bill, but despite their protests the Kansas-Nebraska act was passed on March 3rd, 1854. The 1857 Dredd Scott Supreme Court case was another loss for the Northerners. Dredd Scott was a slave who was taken out of Virginia to Illinois, which was a free state. He took his case all the way to the Supreme Court, but they decided to deny freedom to Scott and his family. They claimed that no black person in the United States was granted any rights that the white man was bound to…

Words 1087 - Pages 5

Manifest Destiny Research Paper

Manifest destiny and the Mexican War inflamed sectionalism because when Texas was given the the U.S., slavery was an issue., as it was allowed in territory it previously was not allowed in. The gaining of the Mexican territories made Americans believe in Manifest Destiny even more. The U.S.Constitution X Amendment allowed states the right to decide for themselves issues not prohibited by the federal government. Slavery was not mentioned in the Constitution at all. The Missouri Compromise stated that…

Words 550 - Pages 3

How Did The Lincoln-Douglas Debates?

anti-slavery president Abraham Lincoln and Stephen A. Douglas, a pro-popular sovereignty supporting slavery United States senator. Consisting of seven long and tedious debates, the topics included the discussion of the Kansas-Nebraska act, the Dred Scott decision, along with broad talks about slavery and equality throughout the nation. Garnering extensive crowd and media attention, these debates acted as a broadcast of political ideas and interests before the era of electronic media, shaping the thoughts…

Words 574 - Pages 3

Supreme Court Case: The Scott Vs. Emerson Case

for many years? Obviously, you would be uncomfortable about being not able to have the same rights as others who did the same or less than you. Then, you would probably feel like Dred Scott, a black man that deal with the reject and injustice until when he was set free as a human, must not as a U.S. citizen. The Scott v. Emerson case took place in the Missouri state court in St. Louise (1846) before it was appealed by the Supreme Court as Dred Scot v. Sandford in 1856. In the Missouri state court,…

Words 825 - Pages 4

Eth 125 Research Paper

African Americans were robbed of their culture. Our language and even religious beliefs were stripped away. Although African Americans were robbed of their culture, we have managed to create a culture all of our own. In the case of Dredd Scott v. Sanford, Dredd Scott an African American sued for his freedom shows us how laws were used to take rights away from African Americans. In March of 1857, the Supreme Court declared that all African Americans those who were slaves as well as those who were…

Words 1084 - Pages 5

Republican Party Dbq

After the Dredd Scott decision in 1857, Republican editor Horace Greely stated, it was “entitled to just so much moral weight as would be the judgment of a majority of those congregated in any Washington bar-room.” (Richardson). This demonstrates the extent to which…

Words 801 - Pages 4

Persuasive Essay On Miranda Rights

Throughout American history the concepts established by the Constitution have been thought to represent the people’s interests. Americans have looked to the Constitution to deliver on the specific promises established within its Preamble, specifically, the promises to “secure the blessings of liberty” and “promote the general welfare” (U.S. Constitution, Preamble). While many Americans assume that the United States government is avidly working to deliver on these promises, it is clear that some aspects…

Words 1831 - Pages 8

Essay on Lincoln: American Civil War and Lincoln 16 th President

Confederacy States Southern states that seceded from the US during the Civil war. 9. Fort Sumter Where first shots of the Civil war were fired. 10. California Statehood September 9, 1850 when California became a free state. 11. Dredd Scott case Slave who sued for his freedom while he was in a free state. Case unsuccessful since slaves weren’t citizens. 12. Reform Movements Women and children’s rights. Temperance movement: Banned alcohol. Abolitionists: Immediate ban of…

Words 802 - Pages 4