The main pro to this is that it is easy. With this option it would only be a matter of time before the drone finds and kills him. Afterwards, all our problems would be gone. Some other pros include less fatalities, cheaper to produce, and make the United States safer by destroying terrorist networks worldwide. Using tradition war weapons kill more civilians than drones do. In WWII, civilian deaths were a total of 40 to 67% of all fatalities, which means that we killed more innocent people than we did enemies. However, since September 11, 2001 drones have only killed 8 to 17% of civilians out of all deaths by U.S. drones. That is one pro, and another is the cost. Roughly, it can cost from $18,000 to $169,000 per hour to operate a manned aircraft. On the other hand, the Department of Defense only budgeted $5 billion for drones is 2012. To sum this up, we spend roughly 6 to 42 times more on manned aircrafts than we do on drones. The last pro I will include is that using drones will make the United States safer by destroying terrorist networks worldwide. President Barack Obama has even said “dozens of highly skilled al Qaeda commanders, trainers, bomb makers and operatives have been taken off the battlefield. Plots have been disrupted that would have targeted international aviation, US transit systems, European cities, and our troops in Afghanistan. Simply put, these strikes have saved lives." (New York Times, "Obama's Speech on Drone Policy," nytimes.com, May 23, 2013). But not only does it protect American citizens from terrorists, but it protects the military from attacks as well. Because drones are unmanned, the men and women controlling them through technology are safe. Since they are not in direct combat, it is proven that they will have a lower risk of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder also. Now that you have had the chance to look at some pros, what are some of the cons? Well according to procon.org, one con is that using drones will create more terrorists than it will kill. Why? Because apparently when someone sees their loved ones injured or killed in drone attacks, they are motivated to join groups and rise against the United States in order to avenge their loved ones. Well in my own opinion, it is not just drone attacks that do this. If anyone saw their loved one killed or injured by a drone or a member of the military, or anything really, they would be motivated enough to do something about it. But nonetheless, it is still considered a consequence of drone