Durkheim V Marx: Society V Individual Essay

Words: 2376
Pages: 10
Open Document
As a cause and as a symptom of social hierarchies, division of labor is an integral part of the structuring of society. Karl Marx and Emile Durkheim both give very different interpretations to the effects causing, evolving, and caused by this division of labor. On one hand, Marx typically vilifies the process, finding it in large part responsible for the oppression of one group by another. On the other hand, Durkheim treats it as a unifying social force, one necessarily maintained for the betterment of all. With such contrasting viewpoints, it is difficult to decide whether this process is necessarily good or bad. In effect, the argument is how far must individual needs be sacrificed for the benefit of society, or how much society must be …show more content…
Durkheim argues that the societies that depend most on this intense division of labor spawn more unified society. He argues that because of the intense specialization, each member of society cannot survive without the contributions of others, “they cannot separate without perishing,” (79). Durkheim likens this relationship to that of an organism where the individuals are organs without which the body (society) would perish but together create something greater than the sum of their parts. As long as man is contributing to society he can find personal satisfaction in that he is rallying and promoting something greater than himself rather than feeling alienated from the product of his labor.

Interestingly enough, Marx and Durkheim describe division of labor very similarly; their disagreement comes from their differing interpretation of its effects. They both describe the division as a process through which specialization in labor occurs and fosters interdependence among its members. However, Marx believes that this interdependence weakens the individual and the specialization alienates the worker from his labor and himself. Durkheim, on the other hand, believes that the specialization allows individuals to more freely pursue their interests and passions and the interdependence forges stronger community bonds. The two philosophers are able to reach these very different conclusions from the same body of evidence by
Show More

Related Documents: Durkheim V Marx: Society V Individual Essay

Acct: Forces B. Sociology Essay

View I. What is Sociology? SOCIOLOGY: A. Sociology offers a perspective or view of the world SOCIOLOGICAL IMAGINATION: - Allows individuals to view their lives as they are shaped by historical/social forces B. Sociology is a science - positivism: C. Sociology and Common Sense D. Sociological Theory - Sociologists…

Words 603 - Pages 3

Syllabus: Sociology and Pp Essay examples

many of the thematic foundations of modern sociology but we will also examine contemporary theories. Learning sociological theory will shed light on many of the fundamental issues in the social sciences and enrich your understanding of contemporary society. COURSE ORGANIZATION: The course is based upon selections from original texts supplemented by lectures and discussion during class. Careful and complete reading of the assigned texts is crucial to your success in the course. Full participation…

Words 1985 - Pages 8

crime and deviance table Essay

FUNCTIONALISM DURKHEIM ROBERT MERTON HIRCHI Collective Sentiment ‘society of saints’ Innovators Normative Organic Societies (restitution) Mechanistic societies (retribution) Utilitariate crime Anomie Functionalist takes a normative approach to crime and deviance. They state that there is agreement in society of what is criminal and deviant behaviour. Rather than these laws being implemented they are agreed upon by individuals due to value consensus. Durkheim Durkheim…

Words 3760 - Pages 16

Essay on Culture of Poverty

scientifically it is routine to dismiss the individual deficiency theory as an apology for social inequality (Fischer, et al, 1996) , it is easy to see how it is embraced in anti-poverty policy which suggests that penalties and incentives can change behavior. 2. Poverty Caused by Cultural Belief Systems that Support Sub-Cultures of Poverty The second theory of poverty roots its cause in the “Culture of Poverty”. This theory is sometimes linked with the individual theory of poverty or other theories…

Words 5574 - Pages 23