For instance, it enhances the status of minority interest. That means that it press smaller issues to be more important, so if a candidate was being elected, they would be elected for the policy voters of the U.S. agree upon. It can also, gives smaller states more a vote/say. Thirdly, it can maintain political stability of the nation by creating a two-party system. Even though it has its advantages, it’s still a risky way of voting because even though a candidate can have popular vote, but if the electors of electoral college give the other candidate a higher vote, so they automatically win the election and become the next U.S. president. For example, the Obama vs. Robney election one candidate had the popular vote but didn’t win because the electoral college vote had the higher vote for the other candidate. Yes, the electoral college have its perks, but there’s a lot of unfairness and risk of upsetting the citizens of United States. Things would be a lot better with popular vote, so that way people feel that their say of how they want their freedom doesn’t matter. This could cause conflict within U.S. citizens . This could also make citizens lose trust in their government,which would want people to change their government. Although this system have been working in the past, it may not be as useful if more and more people are feeling that this system is a waste and may soon cause more problems and situations in the long