Based on this text, she seems to be arguing for, or even supporting a free market system. It may be a more complex system, with various moving components, but nonetheless at its core, it's a free market. There are two parts to how she argues this. One, there is actual date that supports a free market, but also the philosophical themes of her examples point to a free market. The hard date she points out, taking two years to compile, highlighted how 12 irrigation system ran by governmental agencies only had 40 percent of them perform high. Meanwhile, the 25 farm-managed had over 70 percent perform high. There no government-managed inshore fishery groups and 11 were not organized in any way. The other 33 subgroups had informal rules defining who was allowed to fish in that particular location and how harvesting was restricted. Based on these numbers alone, the answer is clear. Let the individual decide what to do. This is a fundamental principle of the free market. In this case, the numbers back up on theory. However, there is more. The most interesting evidence in support comes from the