The reason I state that the adding a bill of rights is absolutely unneeded for is the idea that “Publius, Federalist No 84” has stated in his letter, “For why declare that things shall not be done which there is no power to do?” That is why it is unneeded because Publius explains how these things won’t happen anyways because there is no possibility that it can happen or someone can make it happen. Although in the article “Anti-Federalist No. 84 by Brutus” states “..it is not necessary, for this purpose that individuals should relinquish all their natural rights.” in my understanding, I believe that …show more content…
We also didn’t like the way they controlled but here we are again trying to choose what people have the rights to do. furthermore Publius states “Is it object declare and specify the political privileges of the citizens in the structure and administration of the government?” (Federalist No.84, Publius) Publius explains how the Bill of Rights isn’t seen as a great thing it’s seem as someone is controlling their political views and revoking their privileges making them feel as they are less than somebody. Publius also continues on with how the Bill of Rights limits people's viewpoints by expressing that The Bill of Rights are only helping some not all which I think is very unfair and make people feel as they’re still trapped in the British