Unfortunately, this is gravely untrue, as seen by the rates of female infanticide in countries such as China and India. “Neglect or killing of children may reflect a “survival strategy” that families [in India and China] adopt. Parents might decide to invest more heavily in their “best bets” and neglect the rest. In most cultures, the best bets are often males. Families in these cultures may decide to kill their female children either outright, or passively, through abandonment or starvation to increase the likelihood that their families might survive” (“Female Infanticide in India and China”). In fact, “between 4 million and 12 million girls are thought have been aborted from 1980 to 2010” (“Up to 12 Million Girls Aborted in India in 30 Years”). These statistics prove that eugenics is happening today, right before our very eyes. Countries with little economic opportunities for women are turning to aborting them and lowering the diversity of the human genome because men in these countries are better off. Diversity needs to be celebrated, not …show more content…
So, eradicating genetically inherited diseases that we consider “unfit,” in this environment may be potentially useful in a different time, or even a different environment. For instance, hemochromatosis is a disorder that causes iron to build up in the body. Eventually, the iron can build up to dangerous levels, where it damages organs like the pancreas and the liver; that’s why it’s often called the “iron overload.” Science has now discovered that the gene for hemochromatosis is the most common genetic variant in people of Western European descent. In the case for hemochromatosis, we know that the disease probably provided carriers with protection from the plague by denying the bacteria that causes it the iron it needs to survive (Moalem). This shows us that some illnesses have proven to be useful in the past and provided a genetic advantage at that time period (natural selection and the theory of evolution, people!). If we were to remove this gene from our human genome, whether on purpose or by happenstance, we have no idea of the genetic repercussions that could result from losing it. It’s this unpredictability that makes