Ethics In Pompeii Essay

Submitted By EssayReader25
Words: 1775
Pages: 8
Open Document
Ethics in Pompeii/Herculaneum
The biggest ethical issue relating to Pompeii and Herculaneum is the collecting, displaying, and studying of human remains.
It is said that the plaster casts are more acceptable as they are only impressions, but the issue of respect for the dead and their descendants is a culturally sensitive one. During the latter half of the 20th century, various communities around the world advocated to have ancestral remains returned for reburial
It cant really be deemed appropriate to display someone at the moment of their death.

Is it disrespectful to display human remains at Pompeii and Herculaneum, or in a museum?
Is it less disrespectful to have the casts of the human victims on display?
Should the skeletons be given a proper burial?
What sort of burial; Christian etc?
Where would they be buried?
Are they being treated as nothing more than curiosities?
Is it no longer an issue because they have been dead for such a long time?
Should the casts and skeletons of animals be on display?
Should bones be seen solely as artefacts that provide valuable information?
What is the most appropriate way to store and display human remains?
Should archaeologists have the freedom to pursue scientific enquiry without political and legal constraints?Is holographic display of human remains a better option?Who should have custodianship over human remains?
Ethics can be defined as a system of moral principles by which human actions can be judged good or bad, right or wrong. Ethics can be applied to the treatment of the study and display of human remains at Pompeii and Herculaneum.
The display of victims buried under the Vesuvius ash.
Such issues include And although Fiorelli’s plaster casts are often thought of as an appropriate way of displaying human remains, as can be seen in this source they depict the individual’s at their final moments of death and even more so in Fig. 3, the intricate expressions of their pain and suffering. Here is where the ethical questions become apparent, as how far can societies need for knowledge and curiosity take them in terms of exposing the individual. There are obviously two sides to such an ethical debate and at one end are the scientists and part of the public who hold a general belief that the public should have access to the stories the remains tell. They see them not only important to feed humanities curiosity of their past but an integral aspect of understanding the human being today.
Basically problem is the display of human remains
Collecting, studying and displaying human remains, often without consent, has been commonly practiced in western society. Studies have provided insight into our ancient ancestors; their height and appearance, what kind of work they did, and their life expectancy. However, debate will always remain concerning the ethics of displaying human remains.

How did Hatshepsut become pharaoh
1. Hatshepsut was the only surviving child born to Thutmose I and Queen Ahmose and was believed to be of royal, either being related to Ahmenhotep I (sister or daughter) or some other member of her family.
2. She was only child born to the Egyptian king Thutmose I by his principal wife and queen, Ahmose, Hatshepsut was expected to be queen. After the death of her father at age 12, Hatsheput married her half-brother Thutmose II, whose mother was a lesser wife .During the reign of Thutmose II, Hatshepsut assumed the traditional role of queen and principal wife
3. Thutmose II died after 15 years of reign making Hatshepsut a widow before age of 30, and they had no sons, only a daughter, and the male heir born by a concubine named Isis was still an infant. Thutmose III being too young to assume the throne unaided, hapshepsut served as his regent.
4. After becoming the young successors regent as it was customary for queens to do this until their child was old enough to make decisions on their own, but it must be noted that this was an unprecedented situation in that Hatshepsut
Show More

Related Documents: Ethics In Pompeii Essay

Essay on Anicent History Notes

Pompeii/Hec Most important section is 3. Question on one of these four poin ts…worth 4 points. Other 15 marks are from all others. Learn names such as: Mau Spinazzika Maiuri Zevi Guzzo (no new excavations, tourist fees were kept for the use of Pompeii and Hec. Audio guides, cafes, restrooms, etc) Lazar Bisel All had the same job (expect Mau) as Fiorelli to be the archaeological “superintendent” of Pompeii. Supervise the ongoing archaeology and manage the sites. Teeth at Hec…

Words 681 - Pages 3

Essay about Homer: Gladiator and Greek Drama

Roman Spectacles: General knowledge of gladiators: A gladiator in ancient times was an armed combatant who entered gladiatorial arenas to entertain the Roman Republic and Roman Empire for violent, gore and bloody purpose, all in which was to keep the people of Rome entertained. Majority of gladiators were slaves and were usually sold to gladiatorial schools for training where they'd be taught in the art of fighting. These schools were costumed to harsh conditions of the slaves as there…

Words 5802 - Pages 24