Moreover, anyone who believes in the theory of utilitarianism usually strives for the outcome of creating self-pleasure as often as possible. Obviously, what might bring happiness for some, may create pain for another. When you process the wrong or right of a person’s actions by it consequences you are using the utilitarianism theory. As much, the theory of utilitarianism is concern with the consequences and the outcome meaning a decision is wrong or right depending on the outcome of action (Mulgan, 2014). Utilitarianism view is a person wanting the outcome to be fair and in good judgement for the …show more content…
Therefore in many cases from the point of view of the patient it is reasonable to assume the euthanasia is guided by utilitarianism. For instance, euthanasia is legalized in the following states Oregon (1997), Washington (2009), and Vermont (2013), New Mexico (2014), and Montana (2009). It is clear if utilitarianism leads the support of euthanasia the entire United States legal system will eventually recognize it as best practice. As mentioned earlier, sometimes decisions prohibit the moral rights of some for the majority. For example, individuals who participate in euthanasia in a state that has not legalized the act, may subjective to criminal charges.
As much, individuals interested in euthanasia have a right to that decision. The Right to Die Bill” is extraordinary and it allows support for people to have a choice regarding their life. Research studies of the state of California indicate that the euthanasia law has existed for 20 years and there is no evidence of law being abused by physicians or others (Jennings, 2014). Moreover, many California family members of terminally ill patients who chose euthanasia reported they have no regrets. The euthanasia choice should not be