Euthyphro's Argument Analysis

Words: 413
Pages: 2
Open Document
This piece starts out immediately discussing ethics. At the beginning the conversation between Socrates and Euthyphro talk of a man names Meletus charging Socrates for corrupting his young friends. Socrates mentions that Meletus is a wise man and that he's doing the right thing for trying to make sure the youth are not being corrupted by unwise men. He says that Meletus is justified in his accusations saying his ethics are in line with how they should be. Euthyphro is questioning in the intents of Meletus thinking he's charging him for the wrong reasons, he says he is very smart and that Socrates should listen to him. The conversation then changes to why Euthyphro is at the court house, he responds saying he's prosecuting his father for murder. …show more content…
He says he knows his family is mad on behalf of the prosecution but his ethics are forcing him to continue with the trial. Socrates suggests that Euthyphro should teach him on religious matters so that he could help Socrates in court. Euthyphro agrees and they start discussing what is holy and what is not. Euthyphro basically just presents all of his ethical beliefs and applies them to what is holy. He says the thing that makes holiness is the prosecution of those who commit injustices. Socrates asks for a more generalized definition of the term and he responds saying that its whatever is agreeable to the god is holy. Socrates disagrees with this saying that the gods do unholy acts like fighting. He points out that the gods have different beliefs and that they fight over what is right and wrong or what is holy. This is basically saying that everyone has different beliefs and everyone's ethics are different. The entire discussion of what is holy is basically just the realization that everyone has different definitions of what Is right and wrong. Ethics vary greatly from person to person and by culture to
Show More

Related Documents: Euthyphro's Argument Analysis

Euthyphro's Definition Of Piety

the word holiness (or Piety). The argument of the Euthyphro is to offer a proper definition of piety. This is a result of the fact that Euthyphro wants to answer Socrates’ question of “what is piety?” Socrates is simply looking for a universal describer: what do pious things have in common that can be used to identify them. In this paper, I will describe Euthyphro’s idea of how ‘pious’ is defined in terms of the approval of an authority and defend Socrates’ argument that are pious things loved by all…

Words 1495 - Pages 6

Euthyphro essay

Justice and Piety are two closely related ideas, with different existing beliefs about their relationship. Through logical analysis, Philosophers have deduced the only valid relationship between Justice and Piety to be that Piety is a part of Justice. Some people however refuse to acknowledge this and maintain that Justice and Piety are Coextensive, or that Justice is a part of Piety. This paper will attempt to convince such people of the flaws in their beliefs, and show them that the only viable…

Words 917 - Pages 4

Chapter 14 Refutation 1 Essay examples

the conclusion must necessarily follows from the premises. That is, the argument must be formally valid—have a valid form—and therefore avoid formal fallacies such as those discussed earlier in this book. However, sound reasoning requires more than just that the conclusion follow from the premises. The premises themselves must also be rational or justified. As you have already seen, the conclusions of valid deductive arguments can turn out false unless the premises are also true. The importance of…

Words 3676 - Pages 15