Exclusionary Rule Impact

Words: 893

Pages: 4

Open Document

The Impact of the Exclusionary Rule in Criminal Justice In the United States criminal justice system, the Exclusionary rule has heavily played a huge and important role as a safeguard we have in our system in America. A crucial safeguard against any kind of unlawful government intrusion or any kind of illegal searches or police misconduct. The exclusionary rule is something that prohibits anyone using most or almost all evidence in any case that was gathered and obtained to not be able to be used in a court of law because it is ruled to be in violation of the Fourth Amendment. The primary purpose of this rule is to deter any kind of police misconduct of any kind from violating individuals rights like any unreasonable searches or seizures and …show more content…
In two specific cases, the exclusionary rule was created and established by the Supreme Court in these two key decisions. The impact of these rules is very important to know and it is primarily that it came into existence with the 1914 decision in Weeks v. United States and became completely applicable to the States in the 1961 case of Mapp v. Ohio” (Miller, 1987). The exclusionary rule argument concluded that “on one side is that it depends on how the rule is a protection of an individual's identity in the judiciary, the other case was that it compounds any injustice from any kind of illegal search made” (Exclusionary Rule Debate, 1979). Over the decades, the Supreme Court has constantly refined and expanded the exclusionary rule. There have been ongoing debates within the criminal justice system on the rules effectiveness and necessity really been a subject and talked about a lot. The evolution and establishment of the exclusionary rule is always debated because there's always two sides in thinking that it is very effective to have in the criminal justice system while on the other side think it's not effective and has no deterrence in trying to stop police misconduct from

Essay On Exclusionary Rule

The exclusionary rule prevents the police offers from conducting unnecessary searches and seizures. In addition, any evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment will be inadmissible in court. The evidence found from the unnecessary searches, or forbidden searches are normally ignored as they are considered unreasonable and are considered to be fruits of the forbidden fruit. In the cases where the police have conducted the unreasonable or forbidden search for the evidence of a crime, such…

Words 503 - Pages 3

Bennie Herring Case Summary

for possession of a controlled substance and illegal possession of a firearm. Herring tried to suppress the evidence during his trial under the exclusionary rule, but his request was denied. Herring appealed his conviction and his case was eventually picked up and heard by the United States Supreme Court, which ended…

Words 1722 - Pages 7

What Is Mapp V. Ohio Case Brief

seizures. Decided by the United States Supreme Court in 1961, the case significantly influenced the application of the exclusionary rule, which prohibits evidence obtained through illegal searches or seizures from being used in criminal trials. This synopsis provides an in-depth analysis of the case, its background, legal arguments, Supreme Court decision, and its enduring impact on criminal procedure jurisprudence. Background: In 1957, Cleveland police officers arrived at the home of Dollree Mapp…

Words 531 - Pages 3

Warrantless Search

(2016). Business Law, The Ethical, Global, and E-Commerce Environment. New York: McGraw-Hill Education. 3. What is the usual remedy when law enforcement officers conduct an unconstitutional search? The Exclusionary Rule. The Exclusionary Rule. The exclusionary rule allows evidence seized in illegal searches to not be used in a subsequent trail against an accused whose constitutional rights were violated. (Mallor, Barnes, Langvardt, Prenkert, & McGrory, 2016, p. 154) Mallor, J.P.…

Words 625 - Pages 3

Weeks V. Usa Essay

Weeks V. USA Case Overview This case originated in the city of Kansas City, Missouri. The year the original case was argued was 1913. It did not make its way to the United States Supreme Court until 1914. A man by the name of Fremont Weeks was arrested at his place of employment by officers that were investigating whether or not Weeks had been transporting lottery tickets through the mail. The transporting of lottery tickets was illegal under federal law. While conducting this arrest the officer…

Words 483 - Pages 2

What Police Actions Require Probable Cause

1. Please define probable cause. What police actions require probable cause? Probable cause, which is relatively similar, and is often times confused with reasonable suspicion is found in the fourteenth amendment. Probable cause must be found before an arrest, search, or seizure can be conducted. It’s in the best interest of any officer to make sure they always have probable cause before they search, seize, or arrest someone. The reason being is because if any officer pursues to arrest, search,…

Words 1994 - Pages 8

Essay about CJ 305

Criminal trials having many different aspects that need to be accomplished before there is even any thought of a trial. Having you stuff in line to make sure you do the best job you can takes many many hours, weeks, months, and sometimes even years. People who are not involved in the main parts of a trial and investigations don't understand the magnitude of the time and effort put in by them people. Lawyers, police, and investigators, put many years in to become proficient in there career and…

Words 1823 - Pages 8

Arguments Against The 4th Amendment

against unreasonable searches and seizures, it also protects their undisclosed right to privacy. The right to privacy is sprinkled throughout the Bill of Rights, but it is most prevalent in the Fourth Amendment. The Fourth Amendment also has a major impact in the Supreme court rulings of Mapp v. Ohio, New Jersey v. T.L.O, Verona School District v. Acton, Weeks v. United States, and Safford Unified School District v. Redding. These rulings have set precedent for cases involving the Fourth Amendment…

Words 936 - Pages 4

Mapp v Essay

is a appeal from a conviction for possession of obscene materials. • The U.S. Supreme Court granted Mapp certiorari. Which is a writ from a higher court to a lower one requesting a transcript of the proceedings of a case for review. Overview and Impact of the Case • This was found to be a direct attack against the 4th amendment rights and was later deemed that all evidence obtained by search and seizures in violation of the constitution is inadmissible in a state court • One case that help this…

Words 501 - Pages 3

Insurance: Contract and Final Exam Study Essay

Arbitration Battery Assault Contract Consideration Statute of Frauds Negligence Constructive Eviction Reasonable Doubt Fellow Servant Rule Preponderance of the Evidence NLRA Fiduciary EEOC Grand Jury Articles of Incorporation Judicial Review Specific Performance Stare decisis Establishment Clause Free Exercise Clause Exclusionary Rule Substantive Due Process Procedural Due Process Probable Cause NLRB Fraud Strict Liability Consideration Good Faith…

Words 783 - Pages 4