Execution Essay: The Controversy Of Capital Punishment

Words: 470
Pages: 2

“An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth.” This phrase, along with the idea of written laws, goes back to ancient Mesopotamian culture that prospered long before the Bible was written or the civilizations of the Greeks or Romans flowered. This phrase means that if you do something wrong to a person, then that person has the right to do the same thing to you without punishment. People have different opinions about them both. They both go a long way back in history as well. Capital Punishment, according to “Britannica School High”, is the execution of an offender who has been sentenced to death after conviction of a criminal offense by a court of law. Capital Punishment has long endangered considerable debate about both its mortality and its effect on criminal behavior. Capital Punishment is an extreme penalty for crime. In the past the execution of criminals for a great variety of offenses were carried out by drowning, stoning, hanging, and beheading. Modern day executions are done by electrocution, the gas chamber, or a lethal injection of a drug. Capital …show more content…
According to the “Death Penalty Information Center”,Georgia is one of the many states that do have death penalties! According to “Amnesty International USA”, “The death penalty ,in the US as well as around the world, is a discriminatory and is used inappropriately against the poor, minorities and members of racial, ethnic, and religious communities.” All the problems that death penalties have illustrate the difficulty of creating a workable scale of penalties when death is commonly ordered for many varieties of offenders. “Britannica School High”says that the Support for “death penalty is only for crimes defined as particularly heinous, because only suck criminals deserve to be put to