Explain When Does An Argument Commit The Fallacy Of Appeal To Force

Words: 309
Pages: 2
Open Document
When does an argument commit the fallacy of appeal to force?
Why should we avoid this? How can it be avoided?
Give three "real life" detailed examples.

An argument commits the fallacy of force when either, a threat is issued with it, or there is mention of some unfortunate circumstance that may occur as a result. The way to avoid it is to reject the argument on the face of it since the premise only gives a reason for its irrelevance. A person who genuinely wants to persuade the other person to understand their argument will not resort to threats, but submits valid reasons for the argument and why it should be validated and believed. Another reason we should avoid this is that to resort to threats makes a person sound petty, childish,
Show More

Related Documents: Explain When Does An Argument Commit The Fallacy Of Appeal To Force

fallacy's Essay

Crib Sheet: Mosley's explanation of the fallacies Fallacies: A fallacy is an error in reasoning, false reasoning. A fallacy is a failure and the mark of an argument that should not be credited. From W.R.A.C. Emotionally loaded terms (emotionalism) Emotionalism is different from appealing to emotions. Every persuasive speech should appeal to the reader's emotions, and we will soon learn that psychological appeals are a type of support for value claims. Emotionalism is the use of emotion instead…

Words 2809 - Pages 12

Evaluating An Argument 'Rutherford's Tiger'

1. Evaluating an argument “Rutherford’s Tiger” Key terms: The parents are concerned about the potential harm their children may be placed in by the proximity of the tiger to the nearby elementary school, should the tiger ever escape. The parents fear that the counter measurements to prevent the tiger from escaping are insufficient. Therefore, they want the tiger to be relocated outside the town. Main conclusion: “It is safe to keep a Bengal tiger in the backyard” Argument support: In his defends…

Words 2422 - Pages 10

De Bondt Et All Single Paper

framework, is proposed. „Proponents of behavioral finance argue that poorly informed and unsophisticated investors might lead financial markets to be inefficient. The debate between neoclassical and behavioral finance is wide ranging, and sometimes explains differences in policy recommendations on such issues as financial regulation, corporate governance, or the privatization of social security. It had immediate impact worldwide including emerging markets (Muradoglu, 1989). Behavioral finance emerged…

Words 9682 - Pages 39