Explain the Arguments for and Against Strict Liability Offences Essay

Words: 1387
Pages: 6
Open Document
Explain the arguments for and against strict liability offences
A strict liability offence is one where it is not necessary for the prosecution to prove any mens rea. In most cases of strict liability even if one did not have the intent to commit a crime, however reasonable, in relation to a particular element of the actus reus of an offence, they can still be convicted. This can be shown in reference to Prince and Hibbert. Prince (1875) the girl was taken by Prince even though he knew she was in the possession of her father as he believed she was 18. Mens rea was needed for him to be sentenced and this was recognized as he had the necessary intention to remove her. Hibbert (1869) the defendant had sexual intercourse with a 14 year old …show more content…
An example of this is the Callow v Tillstone (1900) case where a butcher took a vets advice in to account on whether the carcass was healthy enough to be eaten. After examination of the carcass the vet advised the butcher that it was ok for human consumption, thus the butcher put it up for sale. However, it was not fit enough to be eaten. This was a strict liability offence causing the butcher to be sentenced even though he was not at fault as he had taken full measure to ensure the carcass was fully examined before placing it on the market.
Many would argue that strict liability violates one of the fundamental principles of criminal liability that derives from the latin ‘actus non facit reum nisi mens sit rea’ which translates that an act does not make a man guilty of crime, unless his mind is also guilty, as stated by Lord Hailsham in Haughton v Smith [1975] AC 476. Therefore, strict liability which requires no proof of mens rea with respect to atleast one element of actus reus, surely violates this principle in criminal liability as when punishing a man generally requires both an actus reus and a mens rea.
Although there may be a small penalty that comes with strict liability offences, a defendant may still be punished through the humiliation that goes with being convicted of a criminal offence. Due to such a conviction, the reputation and dignity of a defendant may potentially be ruined and their livelihood affected. Since this is
Show More

Related Documents: Explain the Arguments for and Against Strict Liability Offences Essay

Legal studies exam revision Essay

support a conviction in a higher court. If yes it will be sent to country or supreme and a committal mention date will be set ii) Strict Liability Crime: Crimes where mens rea is not required by the prosecution. E.g. parking fines iii) 3 differences between criminal and civil law Civil Criminal Concerned with Rights and responsibilities of individuals Offences against society Resolution Remedies such as compensation/providing a service Defendant receives punishment Standard of proof Balance…

Words 2208 - Pages 9

The Nature Of Crime

probability of harm, but acted anyway Negligence: the person failed to exercise the degree of care, skill or foresight that a reasonable person would have exercised in the same circumstances. c) Strict liability offences. Strict Liability: offences are minor in nature e.g. speeding. For these offences it is not necessary for the prosecution to prove mens rea; proof of the act alone is suitable to constitute a crime. d) Causation. The act or omission committed must have caused the specific…

Words 9727 - Pages 39

Business Law Notes

Chapter one Business Law Law is a set of rules, enforceable by the courts, which regulate the government of the state and governs the relationship between the state and its citizens and between one citizen and another. There are various ways in which the law may be classified; the most important are: * Public and private law * A) Public law is concerned with the relationship between the state and its citizens. Specialised areas are: 1. Constitutional law is concerned with the workings…

Words 34659 - Pages 139

Samuel Millstone V. United States

his employees do not work with industrial equipment or engage in manufacturing, construction, or other industrial activities that may clue them in to the regulated nature of their activities or the standard of care they must meet to avoid criminal liability under the CWA. Based on its holding today, the majority would have this Court convict even a visitor to Bigle Chemical’s plant who negligently forgot to tie his shoes, fell and tripped a switch that discharged.” How to define “corrupting a wtiness”…

Words 5981 - Pages 24

Essay on 125.732 theory summary

125. 732 Theories and empirical conclusions for the following: 1. Corporate Governance The definition of CG: Corporate governance is a major issue for all private and public companies and their stakeholders. With increasing corporate and economic globalization, corporate governance has international relevance in developing countries as well as for the global economic powers. Corporate governance is about balance. It is about balancing the interests of shareholders with those of other stakeholders…

Words 3779 - Pages 16

A Theoretical Perspective on Dowry Deaths in India Essay

jectRESEARCH METHODLOGY Area: Rights of women in India Topic: A Theoretical Perspective on Dowry Deaths in India Objectives: a) To understand the concept of dowry as has originated and evolved in India. b) To conceptualize modern day consequences of dowry system. c) To refer to various laws in India and find out reasons for ineffectuality. d) To analyze the trend lay down in this regard by way of various judicial decisions. e) To critically analyze the reasons for…

Words 22724 - Pages 91