Father’s rights activists are concerned with courts being biased against them, saying that mothers are still stereotyped as …show more content…
Unlike the Father’s Rights Activists who want to fight for the rights of loving fathers, feminists focus on the fathers who are abusive. Organizations like NOW (National Organization for Women) are concerned with women’s rights and how those rights are affected in family court, specifically in regards to battered women caught in abusive relationships with their husbands. Feminists present a valid argument by saying that some of those fathers shouldn’t have rights to have contact with their children because of abuse and violent behavior. They argue that the courts are biased against women, and that in many cases, the partner uses tactics to sway the court’s decision in favor of joint custody or partial custody to the abusive partner. There are many cases where judges granted custody to the abusive partner despite evidence of the competency and responsibility of the non-abusive parent. Additionally, feminists argue that they are fighting for both parent’s rights and that court bias is a result of the long established patriarchy of society. Feminists are concerned with women’s rights and the safety of their children, and in cases of domestic violence and abuse, those concerns are well