They also wanted to regulate commerce with other countries, or establish a sort of trade system, as to keep the United States prosperous financially. But besides being in financial excess, they wanted to establish justice, as said in the preamble of the constitution. Recently people have wanted to study the intentions of the founder of this country, and one of the most prominent philosophers of this area is Myron Magnet, American journalist and historian, writes that "being equal citizens before a law that was the same for all" was the main intent of the Declaration of Independence. And in the Britannica, Joseph J. Ellis writes " [the founding fathers believed] the judicial principle that all citizens are equal before the law". I tend to agree with the government that the ability to have a "free country" and a country that has a "regulated commerce" or even a commerce is an ideal way to have a country. Furthermore, while the United States has been trying to move to more of an egalitarian society, as shown in the civil rights movement, to the more recent Women's day marches, they have been moving to more of an equal, and morally equivalent society. The government chose a path of equality, but also wanted the United States to have a strong economy. Though the government wanted control of the commerce, they planned to have the people of the country be builders of businesses, and to actually make a …show more content…
This is because they have promoted it themselves, but also promote the theory of equality among citizens, but also have been known to be capitalist ever since the economic reforms of the 1970s. This has led to the exponential increase of china's GDP, and now markets itself as a socialist, but also capitalist country. I agree that the Chinese economic reforms, and that the mixture of communism, and the steady income of capitalism have very positive outcomes for china, showing that it is doable, and also profitable. A few things limit economic egalitarianism in a free market society. Economists agree that is is restrained by "Money supply, inflation, lack of jobs and consumer prices may limit economic activity for people who lack wealth. Legal constraints affect economic egalitarianism." It is true that money supply inflation, and lack of jobs could cause an end to economic egalitarianism, but isn't the idea of capitalism that people should also start up a new corporation? I think that if everyone followed through on the egalitarianism, and same with the government, that this could actually work, and help the