Four Wrongful Imprisonment Analysis

Words: 479
Pages: 2

To expand my current knowledge on wrongful imprisonment I took a step back from the the Willingham case and the Avery case and started to pay a bit more attention to other cases to help strengthen the intensity of the issue of wrongful imprisonment and introduce it as a national issue. The title of the article that I read is titled, Four Wrongfully Convicted Men, Four Very Different Outcomes. It is article about four men who were wrongfully convicted and given life sentences, then later exonerated. The article was written by Saskia de Melker, one of the producers from PBS (Public Broadcasting Station). The article was written in 2014 and is portrayed in the third person and basically gives information that had been collected through interviews. The rhetorical modes used …show more content…
The introduction paragraph provides strong imagery. For example, it says, “When a wrongfully convicted person gets released from prison, it is a major news event: Local television crews capture the first moments of freedom and the speeches on the steps of the state capital. . . ” In this article, there is connotation to a statement made by one of the exonerees. Deskovic says, “It was overwhelming. I felt like I didn’t belong, like a fish out of water.”. His statement refers to an idiom which describes a person who feels out of place or out of their comfort zone. The diction and syntax used in this article vary between different speakers. the narrator maintains a steady syntax that is not complex and follow a basic sentence structure format. the diction of the narrator also remain not complex as well. Some of the exonerees with the more heartfelt testimonies tend to have a more complex syntax while the ones who have a more cheerful testimony have a shorter