Essay on Frankenstein: Frankenstein and Monster Humanity

Submitted By JacobMayforth
Words: 942
Pages: 4
Open Document
Jacob Mayforth Frankenstein
Fear and Loathing in Genève At some point in their life everyone has had a monster. It was the embodiment of everything we feared as children, some faceless entity that lived beneath our beds and waited ever patiently for our tiny feet to drop into grabbing distance. At some point we were all afraid of the dark, but as we grew older we learned that this fear was irrational. We learned that monsters, or the monsters we imagined, didn’t exist. Knowledge overcame fear, and therein lays my answer to the question. What is a monster? It is a universal fear, something that can strike terror into the heart of anybody on the planet, and the only universal fear that exists for mankind is the fear of the unknown. Monsters are born out of ignorance; we fear what we do not know. Through evolutionary development the human race has picked up “Panphobia” or “a constant fear of an unknown cause.” I could try to describe this phobia better, but I believe that Steven King, the anointed Emperor of fear himself, hits it right on the head, “Nightmares exist outside of logic, and there’s little fun to be had in explanations. They’re antithetical to the poetry of fear. In a horror story, the victim keeps asking why. But there can be no explanation, and there shouldn’t be one. The unanswered mystery is what stays with us the longest, and it’s what we’ll remember in the end”. “Nightmares exist outside of logic”. Right off the bat King recognizes the basic universal phobia of all mankind. However King goes on to say “there is little fun to be had in explanations, they’re antithetical to the poetry of fear” meaning that to apply reason, logic, motive, what-have-you, to your monster is to remove the shadow of fear from it. So, if we can ever understand a monster, then is ceases being a monster. The question now is: What is a monster, if it is not a monster? I believe an example is in order. In the novel Frankenstein a child is killed. This act is described as monstrous, as it has no motive, or logic to it. It is a senseless murder, thus the townspeople are frightened and angered into quick justice, sentencing and killing an innocent woman. Frankenstein knows the identity of the true killer and seeks him out, but when the monster and the man meet, the monster explains all it desired was understanding, and the murder was an accident. Up until this point the monster had been simply that, a monster, but this sympathetic mission gives the monster humanity. The reader understands the monster now and, although he still committed the murder of a child, the reader seeks to feel sympathetic towards the creature, as does Frankenstein. What happens to a monster when it is not a monster? It becomes evil, maybe an evil that we can understand and sympathize with, but an evil still. Here is another example that doesn’t take place within 18th century literature. A man kills a husband and father of three; monstrous, no? However, later it is discovered that the killer did this with the motive to steal the man’s money and use it to feed his own kids, who need food and clothing of their own. The murderer is still guilty of the crime, but now we can sympathize with him. The act is no longer monstrous, only evil. So why does Mary Shelley give the monster a human side? If the purpose of a monster is to frighten and to torment, then why does she take away the one basic trait that makes things monstrous?
Show More

Related Documents: Essay on Frankenstein: Frankenstein and Monster Humanity

Alienation In Frankenstein

transmit over the elemental foes of our race” (Shelley 23). Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein follows the path of a young scientist, Victor Frankenstein, before and after the dramatic event which forever alters his life--his creation of life. His failure to maintain relationships and support his creation mirrors the failures of his own father. The beast’s carnage follows Victor, forcing him and his creation into near exile from humanity. The novel concludes with Victor’s understanding that he upset the balance…

Words 2249 - Pages 9

Similarities Between Frankenstein And Paradise Lost

literature was created; Frankenstein by Mary W. Shelley and Paradise Lost by John Milton. Romantic writes tended to interpret John Milton’s version of Genesis as a celebration of Satan whom they thought as a rebellious hero defying the power of God. They believed that Satan was a victim of tyrannical power. The creature and Victor draw parallels between themselves and the characters from Paradise Lost such as Adam, God, and Satan. Paradise Lost sets the basis for humanity while Frankenstein pushes the limitations…

Words 906 - Pages 4

Examples Of Confinement In Frankenstein

In the book, Frankenstein, by Mary Shelley, the gothic element of confinement, both physical and psychological, is directly tied to the monster and becomes more prominent when something significant happens related to the monster. Often times, this “confinement” is self-induced, meaning that the characters, though it is primarily demonstrated by Victor Frankenstein, bring physical confinement upon themselves as they chose to isolate themselves from society. This isolation is very destructive to the…

Words 788 - Pages 4

Reflective Essay On Frankenstein

Frankenstein Reflection Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley began Frankenstein in 1816 with a simple horror story in mind; nevertheless, her tale emerged as a renowned piece of literature due to it’s contemplative and introspective nature. While Frankenstein encompasses such themes as empowerment, gender struggle, and fear, her novel heavily examines the effects and consequences of loneliness— of feeling detached from society. Shelley explores this theme through three main vessel: Captain Walton, Victor…

Words 660 - Pages 3

Essay on Frankenstein: Frankenstein and Professor Andrea Yates

February 2013 How To Love Frankenstein by Mary Shelly is a novel based around guilt and rejection, and the outcome of these two things. Victor Frankenstein created this “monster” to show the world that he did the unthinkable, something truly amazing. But he was so self- consumed on how he would be seen as “godlike” for doing this that he did not think about the negative impacts this creature could have to humanity. As the novel progresses many people see the monster as evil and dangerous. But is…

Words 667 - Pages 3

Mary Shelley's Frankenstein and Ridley Scott's Blade Runner Essay

Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein and Ridley Scott’s Blade Runner Comparison and Contrast Introduction Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein and Ridley Scott’s Blade Runner are two story lines created in a different era, Frankenstein being an early published novel on the creation of an experimental monster that longs to have a normal existence whilst Blade Runner is a more modern take to a future society where there have been genetically engineered robots named ‘replicas’ that are in appearance indistinguishable…

Words 888 - Pages 4

How Does Frankenstein Play God

Mary Shelly’s Frankenstein, where monster and man are all too similar. In Frankenstein, the monster and Frankenstein start off as two very different “creatures” for example physically the monster is big and hideous, which is why he is shunned by society while Frankenstein is, on the outside, everything a normal human should look like, yet he isolates himself from society. While the monster hides from prying eyes because of his deformity he yearns for companionship, unlike Frankenstein. Ironically in…

Words 738 - Pages 3

Frankenstein Research Paper

Who is the real monster? “I was benevolent; my soul glowed with love and humanity; but am I not alone, miserably alone?”(Frankenstein, Mary Shelley, 2007) This is what the creature said when he last met Frankenstein on the ice. As a creature, why he didn’t act like monster but looks pathetic? In the novel, Frankenstein looks his creature as a monster, but does the creature is? Or the person who made the monster isn’t a monster? No, Neither of them is not a monster. First, we should ask…

Words 1169 - Pages 5

Frankenstein Comparison

Frankenstein, by Mary Shelley, is a dramatic horror story that takes place in 18th century Europe, in which Victor Frankenstein animates a monster who eventually seeks revenge against Frankenstein after witnessing the faults of mankind – specifically the faults of Frankenstein such as selfishness and abandonment out of fear. As the monster learns more about the world and begins to understand humans and human relationships with one another, he grows more and more depressed and angry. He realizes that…

Words 932 - Pages 4

Role Of The Monster In Mary Shelley's Frankenstein

Frankenstein’s monster learns about human interactions surrounding companionship, lust, guilt, and justification of actions simply by reading Paradise Lost.But what if the monster hadn’t read that specific text? Would his actions towards his creator be any different? If the text was Summa Theologica, the answer would most definitely be yes. Rather than focusing solely upon the negatives of humanity, the Summa Theologica focuses less on the negativity that comes from humanities actions, as well as…

Words 564 - Pages 3