In Jonathan Kozol’s Savage Inequalities: Children in America’s Schools, he examines how the concept of financial equity between schools becomes something very different when put on paper. Equity is argued by some, that what is considered equal, is at best proximal and that the difference in financial input “…is just enough to demarcate the difference between services appropriate to different social classes, and to formalize that difference in their destinies (Kozol, p. 290).” It is these gaps of financial equality that effect a school’s ability to hire and retain well qualified teachers, maintain small class sizes, keep current and relevant educational materials, allow kids to go on field trips and provide extra-curricular activities like clubs, sports and tutoring programs. It is the difference in access to these resources that dictates a school’s ability to implement a more progressive way of teaching, such as Freire’s problem-posing system. But this financial difference also translates into something more paralyzing than outdated school materials, under-paid teachers and the lack of extra curricular activities. It sends a very clear message to those children being brought up through poor school systems that they are not worth anything more than their surroundings and society does not believe they have the capability to do great things. This is the way of the oppressor. The opposite is also true of children who come up through affluent school systems, who are, through the access of unlimited resources, being told that they are more worthy than others (resources in this sense include aesthetically pleasing learning environments, safe transportation to and from school, new and up to date learning materials and designated spaces for eating, studying and convening with classmates). Even though these affluent children are subject to the same “banking-system” way of learning as those coming up though poor school systems, their comfortable environment and abundant resources provide an ease of learning that other children without those amenities cannot cultivate. Kozol makes the poignant argument that these financial differences between school systems are a way to keep those “destined” to be governors separated from those “destined” to be governed; it is the difference between becoming a general or becoming a soldier and works to “…assure that soldiers’