I cannot even imagine having the President of my club, school, country, or anywhere else not speak my language. In this case, I completely agree with these Deaf activist’s values. In my opinion, it would be increasingly difficult to follow, obey, or even have a conversation with someone that does not speak the most-locally used language. These Deaf students had gone to Gallaudet to feel accepted, like they could in not many other places. However, they were once again forced to adapt to their leader instead of their leader adapting to them. This is what, in my opinion, began the rally and protest. Deaf people, along with many different kinds of people, races, genders, etc., have been put down for so long and this was another way to put them down. Furthermore, only four presidents since 1864, had actually been Deaf. I, as a hearing person, thought of this as equating to our US President. A President who could not speak English or did not understand our customs and culture would be very difficult to follow and understand. After watching, learning about, and researching the Deaf President movement, I fully agree with the DPN activists and what they stood