Women in International Relations
Dr. Schemenauer
Gendered Aspects and Effects of Globalization
The roots of globalization can be traced to the United States involvement in World War II
and the formation of the Soviet Union. Prior to these events, both the U.S and Russia were less
politically active outside themselves. The United States broke with its isolationist doctrine and
involved itself in World War II, only when it was attacked directly and could no longer ignore the
events occurring in world politics. As Russia became the Soviet Union, it gained such a
substantial mass that it could not remain a private state. Also, the nature of communist doctrine is
to continue to work toward the liberation of oppressed workers, which will naturally exist
outside of a communist state; therefore, the growth of the Soviet Union was inevitable and the
involvement of the U.S. In world politics was inexorable. The nature of the second world war
was, itself, unique in that Asia was intimately involved with the politics outside itself. During
this time, by revolutionizing war, politics were revolutionized. The alliances made demanded
continuance and were not between single nations, but groups. It is only natural that the League
of Nations and eventually, the United Nations sprung from these events.
The actions of allied nations after WWII, also laid the framework for economic
globalization. Essentially, the work of allied nations to prosecute those “at fault” for the war and
reintegrate survivors thought broad actions, such as creating the state of Israel, created the global
political economy as we know it. By taking charge of the monies and restructuring of “losing”
nations as well as lending and borrowing between “winning” nations, the necessity of a
continued global political economy was assured. The term for and formal doctrine of
globalization grew out of the actions of neoliberals. This tactic emphasizes the necessity of
deregulation and privatization to allow the free market to take its natural course and balance the
global economy (Shepherd 220). The idea that globalization, allowing more actors from outside
an economy, will be to the benefit of all actors requires an extreme amount of faith in the
capitalist free market system. This is an inherently western, gendered belief that assumes all
economies are structurally capitalist, are driven based on western, gendered social structures, and
if they are not, then they should be/wish to be so.
Globalization can be said to be gendered because it plays out the masculine/feminine
dynamic by mapping those associated characteristics onto nations, cultures, and economies.
Fiscally dominant nations become masculine and therefore superior. The economic,
governmental, and cultural practices are also superior by rite of belonging to the dominant
(masculine) nation. The masculine nations must then assume their protector role and protect
weak, less developed, inferior nations from their greatest potential harm: their own essential
being. This is why globalization has transformed from a fiscal initiative, however arrogant in its
inspiration, into a complete cultural and social force. This leads to internalization of the
“feminine” roles proscribed by the global political economy at the national/societal level and the
personal level, causing people to accept further subjugation.
One of the chief problems with neoliberal globalization is that it ignores the current
position of women in both their own national economies and the global political economy as it
exists. This means that the doctrine of globalization itself is not only gendered, but genders its
actors both in the way it is executed and the way it acts upon those that it supposedly helps
(Shepherd 224). According to the doctrine of globalization, gender equality is part and parcel of
economic growth and with sufficient, sustainable growth, equality will come (Shepherd 228).
The