This blot can be removed with genetic engineering. Insulin, the enzyme used to break down sugars, used to have to be extracted from cows or pigs and ended up causing allergic reactions as a side effect. Genentech sought to solve this by engineering a human-directed version of insulin, stopping allergic reactions (Coker 5). Genetic engineering after this success has provided possible treatments for multiple sclerosis, dwarfism, cancer, strokes, HPV, and many other diseases. Treatments made through genetic engineering are safer because they don’t use as much chemicals and are based on humans rather than animals (Coker 5). If genetic engineering is already used to create treatments for diseases then why would humans not do the next step further and cure diseases all together and prevent the need for expensive medications and …show more content…
The fear that unborn children would have no say is unrealistic because what child would argue against being born with a stronger heart or being cured of a chronic disease? To counter the argument of parents only viewing their children as genetic perfection and no longer feeling parental feeling critics may take a look at the parents of children born with disabilities in modern day. They have fierce love for their children despite their born flaws (Green 3). The argument of a divided society is a more real threat than any other worry but still does not hold enough weight to prevent this technology. If genetic engineering was pursued then it would become inexpensive and accessible to anyone, therefore preventing economic power equaling physical perfection. “We should become responsible genetic engineers,” (McCullough 2). Responsibility is the key to preventing this technology from falling into the wrong