In addition, because the elephant can be representative of the native population, this delineates his ultimate discontent and hesitancy towards colonialism altogether. After all, “ the elephant looked no more dangerous than a cow” (6). Alas, however, the narrator shoots, and kill the helpless beast. In doing so, he sets aside his own conscience and ironically, becomes an outcome of British colonialism, helpless against the citizens that watched his every action leading up to the elephant’s inevitable demise. The British solider “could feel their two thousand wills pressing [him] forward, irresistibly” and hear “the devilish roar of glee that went up from the crowd” when he pulled the trigger, as if they were watching the death of the elephant as a means of entertainment (7-8). This is notable because it illustrates the ways in which imperialism, over time, had transformed into a casualty that many found amusement in. In straying away from his beliefs that it would be unjust and inhumane to shoot the elephant, and in conforming with public opinion and norms, the narrator is stripped of individuality, and becomes tyrannized by the people around