After reviewing all the notes in the case, Justice Black and the court over turned the original decision in favor of Gideon. Black concluded that the original ruling violated the Sixth Amendment that the constitution had a high value of an individual being accused of to have representation to put a fair defense. He also made clear that not only do the federal courts must respect this act but also the state courts as well. This made it more clear and consistent process to enforce state courts to appoint attorneys to defendants who are less fortunate and may not be able to afford one. Another example of another case when they used Gideon v. Wainwright as a reference was in the United States in 1966. It was the case of Miranda v. Arizona that involved criminal suspects that were detained prior to questioning by police authorities to be informed of their constitutional right to an attorney. Since the police didn’t inform them of this, they ruled in favor of suspects since their rights were not read to