God and Cosmological Argument Essay

Submitted By Linzmw1
Words: 1733
Pages: 7
Open Document
|

[RESPONSE PAPER] | McCloskey Article |

SUMMARY
This paper is an analytical response to the article, titled “On Being an Atheist,” that was written by H. J. McCloskey in 1968 for the journal Question. The assignment for this paper asked many questions which require responses based on the views of McCloskey in contrast to different philosophical arguments of religion. Such arguments include the Cosmological Argument, Teleological Argument and the Problem of Evil. The paper will also include responses to other statements made by McCloskey about the existence of God overall and his role with the Universe contrasting with Atheism and Theism.
McCloskey refers to the arguments as “proofs” and often implies that they can’t definitively establish the case for God, so therefore they should be abandoned. One point to be made on McCloskey’s statement is that God is viewed as the best explanation for the affects we observe in our Universe. This means that, although we cannot see God and all the affects of what he has created, does not mean that he does not exist. As pointed out in the lesson, there are many other scientific theories, with very solid arguments, in which we cannot see but which most people have accepted. This is where the basis formed to build the arguments on the creation and beginning of the Universe and the creator itself. When referring to each of the philosophical arguments, it is made clear that it is not as plausible to be able to have a strong and solid argument for the existence of God with each argument on its own. Rather, you would need to make a cumulative case. A cumulative case would be able to bring the three main philosophical arguments together, using the strongest parts of each, and build one independent type of argument for the existence of God that would then be much harder to argue against. The three main arguments that would be included would consist of the Cosmological Argument, the Teleological Argument and the Moral Argument.
The Article of topic has many views on the Cosmological Argument. McCloskey claims that the “mere existence of the world constitutes no reason for believing in such a being [i.e. a necessarily existing being].” The basis of my explanation in response to this statement is pulled from Evans’ discussion of contingency. This explains that there needs to be a reason for why there is something rather than nothing. The non-temporal form of the Cosmological Argument does not dictate when the Universe began; it makes no difference to the argument if the Universe is new, old or has always existed. Therefore, if the Universe has, in fact, always existed and is said by McCloskey to be necessary and have no cause, then the question has to be asked, why is there a Universe instead of nothing? Further into Evans’ discussion, it is explained that if objects and the Universe may not have otherwise existed, then we need a reason for why they were created. With that being said, with the existence of a contingent Universe, there has to be a necessary being as the cause of its existence. A necessary being is explained to be a being that cannot fail to exist and is the cause of all other existence. The only explanation provided for contingent beings, being the Universe, is if there is a necessary cause for their existence, which is stated as being God. If one decides to accept the Cosmological Argument, they are agreeing to the acceptance that there is a God in a sense. McCloskey states that the Cosmological Argument, “does not entitle us to postulate an all-powerful, all-perfect, uncaused cause.” McCloskey is correct to make this statement because in no way does the Cosmological Argument make any statements about the necessary elements to explain God, only simply the existence of a necessary being. Therefore, anyone willing to accept the Cosmological Argument would need to continue their research in order to gain a clear understanding of the necessary being that is being spoken
Show More

Related Documents: God and Cosmological Argument Essay

The Cosmological Argument Fails To Demo Essay examples

Examine the argument against the cosmological argument for the existence of God (30) There are as many people against the cosmological argument as there are supporters of the argument. Even though this argument may be seen as strong as it is one of the oldest arguments to prove the existence of God flaws can be found within the argument. The facts the argument is based on are found from medical science which is not valid anymore as science as moved on and advanced since then. Since science has…

Words 647 - Pages 3

The Cosmological Argument Essay

The Cosmological Argument The Cosmological Argument simply proposes the argument, that God is the creator of the universe and without God there would be nothing. This argument is the simplest of all arguments as it begins with the simple fact that there is a universe. With this provided it means there are various different strengths and weaknesses put forward for this argument leading on to a final conclusion to the end to decide if this argument successfully proves the existence of God. The…

Words 957 - Pages 4

Cosmological Argument For God's Existence

The cosmological argument is a strong argument for Gods existence. This argument is a series of arguments that all attempt to demonstrate the existence of sufficient reason or first cause of the existence of the cosmos. There are three different groups for this argument, the Kalam cosmological argument for a First Cause of the beginning of the universe, the Thomas cosmological argument for a sustaining Ground of Being of the world, and the Leibnizian cosmological argument for a Sufficient reason…

Words 296 - Pages 2

Cosmological Argument Essays

and how God created the universe in seven days. However growing up I have naturally thought to question this notion of creationism due to influences such as in education; examples being simply studying Biology and how we learn about evolution and the main influence, peers. In what way can this be detrimental to religion in the future? In this short essay I will be looking at the arguments for and against the existence of God relevant to the cosmological argument. There are many arguments for and…

Words 653 - Pages 3

athiest paper

existence of God for centuries. In the article "On being an Atheist" by H. J. McCloskey he states that the cosmological, teleological, and the argument from design are false. He also said that there is no definitive proof that God exists so we should forget the idea of God. The main issue that McCloskey has with God is because of the presence of evil in the world. ARGUMENTS AS “PROOFS” ON THE CASE OF GOD Throughout this article McCloskey uses the word “proof” when referring to arguments which he believes…

Words 1634 - Pages 7

Cosmological Argument Analysis

Cosmological Argument and Principle of Sufficient Reason The Cosmological Argument is a philosophical argument for the existence of God and claims all things in the world depends on the something else for their existence. The Principle of Sufficient Reason is an explanation that everything that exist in the universe must have a reason or cause behind the existence. The Principle of Sufficient Reason states that everything must be either dependent or self- existent. If the universe is dependent…

Words 611 - Pages 3

League of Natyiom Essay

What is Cosmological Argument? The word ‘cosmos’ refers to the universe as an ordered, harmonious and holistic entity. The cosmological argument therefore argues for the existence of God a posterior based on the apparent order in the universe. There was a Saint called St. Thomas Aquinas born 1225 March 7th and he died 1274. He is the idea that philosophy can help us come to a better understanding of theology- the study of God. Aquinas asked this question “is it obvious that there is a God?” he then…

Words 464 - Pages 2

Philosophy: Existence and Cosmological Argument Essay

Aquinas argument on the existence of God through the order of the world helps to further explain my definition of philosophy. I overall agree with Aquinas reasons on the belief of God due to the order set around us and compare the points of my definition to his. Aquinas believes that his cosmological argument is epistemic rationality, rationality that comes from the concerns evidence for the truth of a proposition. Aquinas states that the world exhibits order L (logos), if so then God Exists, therefore…

Words 667 - Pages 3

Mccloskey Argumentative Analysis

the existence of God plagues humanity. For centuries, philosophers debated the question of this existence. One philosopher, H. J. McCloskey, wrote an article in February 1968 entitled "On Being an Atheist." In his article McCloskey argues against the three common arguments for the existence of God. The arguments, or proofs as McCloskey refers to them, are the cosmological argument, the teleological argument, and the argument from design. While most scholars see the last two arguments as being the same…

Words 1615 - Pages 7

Cosmological Argument Essay

features of the cosmological argument for the existence of God. The cosmological argument comes from the Greek ‘cosmos’ meaning universe. It is one of the oldest arguments that attempts to prove the existence of God. It does this based on the starting point that there is a universe, and seeks to prove why there is a universe rather than nothingness. It takes the form of an a posteriori argument. This means that it is inductive and so based on experience. It is also a synthetic argument, meaning that…

Words 1304 - Pages 6