Griswold V. Connecticut Case Analysis

Words: 829

Pages: 4

Open Document

The Court first recognized the existence of a right to sexual privacy in Griswold v. Connecticut (1965), the Supreme Court ruled that the ban on contraceptives violated the right to privacy in marriage. The case was based on Connecticut law which criminalized the use of birth control. The 1879 law stated that "any person who uses any drug, medicinal article or instrument for the purposes of preventing conception shall be fined not less than forty dollars or imprisoned not less than sixty days." The law continued to say that "any person who assists, abets, counsels, causes, hires or commands another to commit any offense may be prosecuted and punished as if he were the principal offender. (McBride)” The ruling recognized that the Constitution does not explicitly protect one's general right to privacy; however, the Bill of Rights created explicit zones of privacy. …show more content…
Baird (1972), and that the state could not ban most abortions in Roe v. Wade (1973). “[Griswold] expressly disclaimed any reliance on the doctrine of "substantive due process," and grounded the so-called "right to privacy" in penumbras of constitutional provisions other than the Due Process Clause. (qtd. in Chandler)” The Court identified the right to privacy in Griswold, and used the Equal Protection Clause to Eisenstadt v. Baird (1972),which extended the right to contraceptive privacy to unmarried

POL330 Midterm#1 Essay

Minor v. Happerset [Holding: The Fourteenth Amendment does not guarantee women the right to vote.] [overruled by Amendment 19th, 1920] [summary: Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 1Si (1875), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Constitution did not grant women the right to vote. The Supreme Court upheld state court decisions in Missouri, which had refused to register a woman as a lawful voter because that state's laws allowed only men to vote. The Minor v. Happersett…

Words 3008 - Pages 13

Supreme Court of the United States and Iit Chicago-kent College Essay

Porwancher word count: Midterm Roe vs. Wade an enduring controversy Roe v. Wade (1973) is considered one of the most controversial Supreme Court decisions in American judicial history. Abortion is still a hot political issue to this day. Various states legislatures have passes stringent laws which are making it nearly impossible for women to even seek an abortion. This paper will prove that many states have refused to enforce Roe v. Wade and in doing so state legislatures have passed laws which make…

Words 2309 - Pages 10

Roe V. Wade Case Study

The case of Roe v. Wade is a decision of landmark by the Supreme Court of the United States of America regarding abortion. The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff claiming that the decision by a woman to have an abortion is protected by the right to privacy. This case produced major controversies in the United States with some people wondering whether the court had gone overboard in making the decision (Rubin, 1982). This paper will summarize the Roe V. Wade case stating the constitutional issue…

Words 1270 - Pages 6

Constitution And Originalism Analysis

When interpreting the constitution, the doctrine of originalism and the dependence on founder’s intent is typically referred to as the more defensible style of constitutional interpretation, yet with further analysis this becomes invalid. Due to the vagueness of the text, and the ideology of compromise at the core of its creation, originalist style of interpretation becomes far less defensible than that of a living constitution. Even so, there still must be guidelines in place that limit the extent…

Words 1582 - Pages 7

Con Law Essay

individuals from intrusion Two types of challenges: * As applied – claiming that the statute is uncon as applied in this case * Facial – statute must be struck down entirely, no constitutional applications Judicial Review: federal courts have the ability to review the constitutionality of decisions and actions of other branches of government Marbury v. Madison: Courts can order executive/legislative officials to perform non-discretionary duties, but not discretionary acts; Courts…

Words 7565 - Pages 31

Constitutional Right to Privacy and the Us Patriot Act Essays

Privacy Essay Privacy. What do you think the average American would say if you told them they have no Constitutional Right to Privacy, as privacy is never mentioned anywhere in the Constitution? That the information they share over the World Wide Web has little if any protection by or from the government. Of course our government is hard at work to modernize the form of weeding out the unsanitary to which some cenacles might call censorship. But the main question still stands, do we have a right…

Words 4852 - Pages 20