Griswold Vs Jackson Right To Privacy

There are many rights that freedom is engrained in the Constitution that include the Freedom of Speech and Freedom of Religion. There are certain cases that prove this right, such as situations from birth control to wiretapping. The topic Right to Privacy is something many people take seriously Examples of these cases would be Griswold v. Connecticut, Roe v. Wade, and Dobbs v. Jackson. Privacy is something that most people feel is important. They feel as if they should have a right to, and yet the Constitution never uses the word privacy. Many are concerned if they have a right to privacy. Privacy is an aspect in so many different parts of our lives, from the freedom to think for yourself, the privacy of your home, the privacy of your car, …show more content…
Numerous people tried, arguing that his privacy was violated and that the case should have been dismissed. The Court told many sources the Fourth Amendment protects people, not places. (Stewart). Therefore, his cell phone was his privacy, but he was attending the phone booth, so the Fourth Amendment did not apply to this particular case. The Supreme Court has heard many cases pertaining to the question of privacy, including Griswold v. Connecticut, Roe v. Wade, and Dobbs v. Jackson. The Griswold case stems back to 1879, when Connecticut passed a law that could ban the use of any drug, medical device, or other instrument in continuing contraception (Douglas). Lee Buxton, a gynecologist, established a birth control clinic in New Haven simultaneously with Estelle Griswold. Later they were arrested and convicted for violating the law, while their convictions were affirmed by higher state courts (Douglas). The plan of action involved utilizing the clinic to challenge the constitutionality of the bill in question under the Fourteenth Amendment before the Supreme …show more content…
Later after the discovery case, the district court ruled in favor of the clinic by granting a motion for summary judgment. Mississippi was banned from enforcing the law. The Constitution does not specifically mention abortion. The right is neither deeply rooted in the nation’s history, nor an essential component of “ordered liberty” (Dobbs). There are five factors that are used to decide whether a precedent should be overruled, supporting overruling Roe v Wade and Planned Parenthood v Casey. These include short-circuited the democratic process, which both lacked grounding in constitutional text, history, or precedent, the tests they established were not “workable”, they caused distortion of law in other areas, and overruling them would not uphold concrete reliance on interest. (Dobbs). Justices Clarence Thomas, Brett Kavanaugh, and Chief Justice John Roberts concurred in the judgment while Justices Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan dissented (Dobbs). This case resulted in the Constitution not endowing a right to abortion. With Roe and Casey being overruled, this would allow the authority to control abortion and return to the

Show More

Related Documents: Griswold Vs Jackson Right To Privacy

Con Law Essay