An individual lone man or woman living independently of others is rare and uncommon (Forsyth, 2006). Groups are essential to the lives of homo-sapiens, and vary from groups of two to a collective of thousands. It was found that on average groups tend to be fairly small and have a range from two members to seven members. Group dynamics aims to understand the larger systematic and interactions between people. Working and living in groups requires a different set of perceptual filters to infer and recognize what is going on (Forsyth, 2006). It is to these collectives that some of society’s most taxing tasks are differed, for example it is the job of a group of judges to decides whether a law or judgement is consistent with a countries constitution (Parks) much similar to the scenario in the play or film 12 Angry Men that follows a group for jurors through their decision making process.
In order to continue this paper and conduct discourse analysis on it is essential that, it is verified that the board of jurors in the …show more content…
46) In the first act the judge declares that the decision reached must be the jury is unanimous, this condition roots independence in the group, that is, mainly the length of the decision making process is dependent on each member of the juror and how they decide to vote either, guilty or not guilty. As already established a relation was created when gentlemen were summoned as jurors. In addition, independence implies a reliance on one another, this reliance in clearest with regard to opinion on the cause as we see the vote go from eleven for guilty, one for not guilty to a progressive shift, from that to a hung jury during the second act. Juror number two is the second man to be convinced of the presence of reasonable doubt in act