Habeas Corpus and The War On Terror Essay

Submitted By wattslizz
Words: 1923
Pages: 8
Open Document
Habeas Corpus And The War On Terror
Elizabeth Watts
November 11, 2014
POL201 : American National Government
Instructor Megan Ellinger

Habeas Corpus, Latin for “you have the body”, is used to bring a prisoner before the court to determine if the person's imprisonment is lawful. What happens when the President decides it is time to suspend habeas corpus? During the War on Terror President Bush passes legislation banning prisoners of war from utilizing the writ that has been around since the time the Magna Carta in England was written. In doing this, many cases developed in which those prisoners petitioned the Acts that were passed, and many opinions and questions about liberty in the United States and the US Constitution arose.

Habeas corpus first appeared in the Magna Carta of 1215, and is the oldest human right in the history of English-speaking civilization. From 1215 to the Bush Administration, the argument for a strong executive has been the same; in times of crisis and emergency, it is the President’s responsibility to preserve and protect the homeland, even if that means curtailing personal freedom in the process. “Ultimately, after 500 years of development, habeas corpus evolved into a robust check on the Crown’s power to arbitrarily detain. It was deemed so critical to liberty that it alone among the great writs was incorporated into the U.S. Constitution, arguably becoming the most important original human rights provision prior to the introduction of the Bill of Rights.” (Shackelford, 2009). In 1996, Congress narrowed the writ of habeas corpus through the passage of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act, and after September 11th, 2001, it became harder for prisoners of Guantanamo Bay to have access to habeas corpus. The Detainee Treatment Act of 2005 and the Military Commissions Act of 2006 further narrowed the scope of habeas relief, providing that prisoners held in Guantanamo Bay may not access the federal courts through habeas corpus; instead, they must go through the military commissions and then seek appeal in the D.C. Circuit Court. Habeas corpus is protected by the US Constitution, which provides limits on the power of Congress that “the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in cases of rebellion or invasion the public safety may require it.” The Sixth Amendment rights of accused persons provide the framework for habeas corpus petitions.

The Bush Administration suspended habeas corpus with the passing of the Military Commissions Act in October 2006. President Bush signed a law suspending the right of habeas corpus to persons determined by the United States to be an enemy combatant in the Global War on Terror. The law states “No court, justice, or judge shall have jurisdiction to hear or consider an application for a writ of habeas corpus filed by or on behalf of an alien detained by the United States who has been determined by the United States to have been properly detained as an enemy combatant or is awaiting such determination”. The bill grants the President of the United States almost unlimited power to establish and conduct the military to try persons considered to be enemy combatants. The problem with this was it did not specifically designate who in the United States would determine who is and who is not an enemy combatant.

There were a few cases in which President Bush and the Military Commissions Act was petitioned. In the case of Rasul v. Bush, the Court faced petitions for habeas brought on behalf of two Australians and twelve Kuwaitis who were captured abroad and held without charges amidst hostilities between the United States and the Taliban. Petitioners filed suits under federal law challenging the legality of their detention, alleging that they had never been combatants against the United States or engaged in terrorist acts, and that they have never been charged with wrongdoing, permitted to consult a
Show More

Related Documents: Habeas Corpus and The War On Terror Essay

Essay Habeas Corpus and the War on Terror

Habeas Corpus and the War on Terror POL201 Instructor Looney 5/31/2014 When an individual is imprisoned they have the right to be brought before a judge to have their case analyzed to determine whether their detained status will be permanent or temporary. This right is called a writ of habeas corpus and it was created in the English legal system, it has now expanded to many nations (Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia.2014). A writ of habeas corpus ensures…

Words 1992 - Pages 8

Habeas Corpus, Civil Liberties And War On Terror

Habeas Corpus, Civil Liberties and War on Terror Cynthia Jones POL201 Martin Sweaney July 29, 2013 Looking at the “writ of habeas corpus” through the eyes of three presidents and the matter of the “enemy combatants” put in prison, in Guantanamo Bay, on leased land the government of Cuba. We find that some of these are innocence of a crime they have not committed. I seek out the underling of all prisoners held in a compound with no legal rights, civil rights and not able to exercise…

Words 1614 - Pages 7

Civil Liberties, Habeas Corpus, And The War On Terror

Civil Liberties, Habeas Corpus, and the War on Terror Charlotte Ashford University 04//2013 POL 201 Instructor Civil Liberties, Habeas Corpus, and the War on Terror have all played a role throughout history. Throughout history, the motivation of man’s self interest has concluded in the domination of those with little or no power in the absence of the rule of law. The war on terror presents an unpredictable challenge for the United States since terrorists are apprehended…

Words 1995 - Pages 8

Essay Civil Liberties, Habeas Corpus, and the War on Terror

Liberties, Habeas Corpus, and the War on Terror Jennifer Proctor POL201: American National Government Instructor: Luke Martin 10/29/12 Habeas Corpus has been around for very many years. Although no one knows its exact origin it still dates back pretty far. Habeas Corpus has been seen as a good thing and a bad thing. It has been around for every war we have had. It has also been suspended by two of our presidents in the past. The story and history of Habeas Corpus is a very…

Words 1846 - Pages 8

Civil Liberties, Habeas Corpus, and the War on Terror Essay

Civil Liberties, Habeas Corpus, and the War on Terror Civil Liberties, Habeas Corpus, and the War on Terror Do you remember where you were on September 11, 2001? I was working as a Personal Care Provider in a Senior Home at Newport, NJ. Do you remember the feeling you felt when you saw the planes crashing on the Twin Towers in New York? I remember feeling powerless. I wanted to do something to help out the people trapped in those towers. It was a horrible feeling not to be able to help…

Words 2165 - Pages 9

Habeas Paper

Habeas Corpus Today POL 201 American National Government Instructor Robert Dunaway February 11, 2013 Habeas Corpus Today Today’s war on terror seems to still be as alive and emotional in many minds of Americans, in the aftermath of a day I will never forget, September 11, 2001 when the Pentagon where I worked was hit by terrorists; and this seemingly never ending war still has the president, congress, and Supreme Court deeply involved in debate on Habeas Corpus and civil liberty…

Words 2283 - Pages 10

Essay on POL 201 Final

in the Context of the War on Terror Shaun Davis POL 201American National Government Instructor Farrell Binder February 16, 2015 Civil Liberties in the Context of the War on Terror On September 11, 2011, I was driving in my car headed home after a strenuous physical training session as a sergeant in the United States Army stationed in Fort Campbell Kentucky. I remember hearing on the radio that the United States was attacked by terrorist which would ultimately lead to war. I received a phone…

Words 1963 - Pages 8

week 5 Final Paper

Civil Liberties, Habeas Corpus, and the War on Terror Tracy Bush POL201 / American National Government Debra Oliver February 23, 2015 Civil Liberties, Habeas Corpus, and the War on Terror Heabeas Corpus has had our country and its representitives in turmoil for many years. The controversy being who should be able to exercise the right to habeas corpus and what should the prameters concerning it be. The laws and restrictions o=cnernng habeas corpus are not clear or definitive, creating strife, confusion…

Words 2465 - Pages 10

Habeas Corpus Research Paper

Congress the power to suspend the right to a writ of habeas corpus in times of rebellion or invasion. The war on terror has created many a rift in political, judicial and civil rights circles thus creating unique circumstances in regard to dealing with individuals detained due to acts of terrorism. The Habeas Corpus Act ensures that due process is given to those who believe they are innocent of charges set upon them. However those rights to habeas corpus are forfeited when they are found to be guilty of…

Words 2247 - Pages 9

Pol 201 Final Paper

The War on Terror – Rights and Liberties Michael Jackson POL 201 Professor Weinerman November 9, 2012 The War on Terror – Rights and Liberties In order to understand rights and liberties during wartime situations, some background information needs to be addressed and explained. This paper will explain the definition of habeas corpus and the role of the Judicial, Legislative and Executive Branches of government during wartime and conflicts, how the President will sometimes take matter into…

Words 1982 - Pages 8