After reviewing the facts of case, I do not believe the prosecution would have been able to secure a conviction without the fiber evidence. In addition to the fiber evidence, the prosecution also presented hair analysis evidence and witness testimonies (Polk, 2010). During the 1982 trial, DNA technology was in its infancy and it was not validated as a courtroom science, so scientists were only able to provide hair analysis testimony from what they observed underneath a microscope (Polk, 2010).…
Words 325 - Pages 2