Hearing Testimony Case

Words: 2743
Pages: 11
Open Document
This case is before the undersigned on a request for hearing dated July 19, 2023 (20 CFR 404.929 et seq.). The claimant appeared and testified at a hearing held on February 28, 2024, in Mauldin, SC (Hearing Testimony). The claimant is represented by Brian Asheley Buchanan, an attorney, and co-representative Christian Connally (Exhibit 2B). Christian Connally appeared and represented the claimant at the hearing (Hearing Testimony). Elizabeth Shultz, an impartial vocational expert, and Susan Harris Robinson, witness for the claimant, also appeared at the hearing (Hearing Testimony). The claimant is alleging disability since June 10, 2022.

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

After careful consideration of the entire record, the undersigned …show more content…
The claimant’s sister testified that he has difficulty focusing, difficulty speaking, difficulty communicating with others, difficulty with his short-term memory, and his executive decision skills are impaired (Hearing Testimony). The claimant’s sister’s statements are consistent with the record. For example, the record indicates that he was diagnosed with neurocognitive disorder, which causes confusion issues with focus, and forgetfulness at times (Exhibits 14F at 43 and 15F at 6). In addition, a September 2021 neuropsychological evaluation test score supported at decline in neurocognitive function has occurred (Exhibit 1F at 6). Specifically, the examiner noted that the claimant’s processing speed was low average, his accuracy in number and letter sequences or translating letters to special symbols was low average, and his holding and manipulating digit sequences in forward, backward, and numerical order was speech was slurred, and he laughed inappropriately (Exhibit 1F at 1 and 4). During a July 2023 mental status exam, he demonstrated difficulties with memory and articulating clearly (Exhibit 14F at 43). In October 2023, the record notes that the claimant continues to experience a deterioration in cognition and physical ability (Exhibit 15F at 6). As a result, this would limit understanding, remembering, and carrying out simple, routine tasks, …show more content…
The claimant reported that he had been experiencing depression, anxiety, irritability, lack of motivation, lack of patience, difficulty focusing, slurring his words at times, issues comprehending others, and low appetite in response to a recent diagnosis of supranuclear palsy and his inability to continue working in politics and at his hardware store (Exhibit 6F at 8 and 10). The claimant also reports having reoccurring thoughts about a past sexual trauma incident involving a military superior, which has impacted his relationships with others (Exhibit 6F at 6). He also reported having reoccurring thoughts about his oldest son’s suicide eight years ago and wishing that he had had the opportunity to talk to his son because he believes he could have talked his son out of it (Exhibit 6F at 11). The claimant’s statements are consistent with the record. For example, the record indicates that the claimant has been diagnosed with adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed mood (Exhibit 5F at 8). Instructions had to be repeated to ensure the claimant’s comprehension and he laughed inappropriately during the exam on September 9, 2021. The claimant had flat affect during an exam on November 31, 2023 (Exhibit 14F at 30). As a result, this would limit understanding, remembering, and carrying out simple, routine tasks, involving simple work-related decisions,
Show More

Related Documents: Hearing Testimony Case

Prejudice And Racism In Robert Louis Stevenson's Just Mercy

chapters nine through eleven of Stevenson’s Just Mercy, Walter’s Rule 32 hearing is held, in which Stevenson calls on witnesses who can weaken the initial testimonies against Walter, showing the role race plays within witness credibility in the court. Walter’s hearing gains attention from many community members, specifically black, which come to support him, but are intentionally intimidated from the hearing. While the hearing goes well, Stevenson and Michael still fear there that opposing individuals…

Words 373 - Pages 2

Lynn Rubinett Case Summary

Docket Number: 074-SE-1113 Hearing Officer: Lynn Rubinett, Originally Assigned Lucius D. Bunton, Transferred Assignment Plaintiff’s Attorney: Dorene Philpot - Galveston, TX Respondent’s Attorney: Nona Matthews and Gwendolyn Maez – Irving, TX 1. Facts: Explain the essential facts of the hearing. Tell the story of the hearing in your own words. The Petitioner purported that the Grapevine-Colleyville Independent School District had forgone their Child Find duties and that the district had…

Words 1050 - Pages 5

Mr Spicer Case Summary

follows: On the Alexander case, DHR is enforcing an Order signed October 27, 1997 ordering the sum of $67.50 per month towards the arrears and the interest. On the Wilson case, DHR is enforcing an Order signed by Judge Jack W. Meigs on October 16, 2002 ordering the sum of $347.00 per month commencing on November 1, 2002. The NCP did not initially provide any documentation to support his allegations of not owing support and the past due support being incorrect on either case after supporting documentation…

Words 1552 - Pages 7

Lizzie Borden Case Study

The Lizzie Borden case is extremely intriguing. Andrew and Abby Borden were both found brutally murdered in their home in Fall River, Massachusetts. Lizzie Borden, Andrew and Abby’s daughter, notified the family’s maid of the discovery of Andrew Borden lying dead of the sofa. The authorities were notified and a subsequent search of the house found the body of Abby. According to Barbara Maranzani of History.com, Andrew Borden did not lack in the area of enemies and by all accounts was involved in…

Words 729 - Pages 3

Essay about acc 4435

to be believed without inferences or conclusions from it? Direct evidence depends on the credibility of the witness. For example, W testifies that she saw D strangle V with a stocking. W’s testimony is direct evidence on the issue of whether D did in fact strangle V with a stocking, since if that testimony is believed, the issue is resolved. Circumstantial evidence depends on both the credibility of the witness and inferences from the witness. Circumstantial evidence is evidence which, even…

Words 8538 - Pages 35

Robert Auchmuncy: The Quelch And Bellamy Trial

court officials which helps to explain this regularity. As previously discussed, there were personnel connections between the Quelch and Bellamy trial, despite the two hearings taking place thirteen years apart. This trend continued over the next decade as key courtroom officials routinely maintained their visible position from one hearing to the next. Robert Auchmuty served as defense counsel during the Bellamy crew trials, and as the King’s Advocate for the final two piracy trials in the colony. John…

Words 1598 - Pages 7

Thanksgiving: O. J. Simpson Murder Case and Criminal Justice Process Essay

This paper will explain how the criminal justice system works. The O.J. Simpson case was used to outline the roles in the criminal justice process. This paper will detail information from the reporting of the crime to the sentencing in which Simpson was found not guilty of committing murder. Dates have been included in the paper to insure the timeline is accurate. The intent of this paper is to outline the case from start to finish. The criminal justice process is a very complex system that…

Words 1578 - Pages 7

People V Wilkerson Case Summary

especially in capital murder cases, is causality. These issues are based on whether a connection can be made between the killing of another and the plaintiff's conduct under People v. Wilkerson's case provides a comprehensive analysis of the issue of causation and potential criminal liability that could lead to Wilkinson (2020). A decision by the Supreme Court, Division of Investigation, Second Department, State of New York, in 2020 is a good example. More specifically, this case focuses on Keith Wilkinson…

Words 1761 - Pages 8

12 Angry Men Essay

1957, Rose highlights how important it is that the jury discuss all of the evidence from the case in detail and from multiple angles. Representative of this notion is the 8th Juror who is willing to acknowledge alternative views or interpretations. From the outset of the play he goes against the crowd voting “not guilty”. He then considers all of the details of the evidence including the old man’s testimony and the boy’s inability to remember the movie he saw. In contrast to this character, are…

Words 986 - Pages 4

A Bull Persuasive Speech

Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, I would like to thank you for being taxed with the grueling process of hearing evidence, testimonies, and speculation throughout these few days. However, we are here today to decide the fate of not a man, but a boy. To convict a boy guilty of “murder in the first degree- premeditated homicide… the most serious charge tried in our criminal courts,” (Rose 5). Sentencing a boy to die in a prison, or convict him not guilty, setting him free. Ladies and gentlemen we all…

Words 1433 - Pages 6