David and Barbara Green are plaintiffs, who owns and operates Hobby Lobby Store, Inc., which is a for-profit corporation selling national arts and crafts. The Green family had their businesses based on Christian belief and the company had desire to organized with Christian faith principles. They believed that their employees should spend Sundays with the family and operated only 66 hours a week. The Affordable Care Act requires health care plans that covers certain types of preventative care, including contraceptive methods. The owners of Hobby Lobby denied its employees’ health coverage of contraceptive methods due to their religious objection. The Green family argued that providing or paying for these forms of birth controls, …show more content…
It was the first time that the Supreme Court has said that business owners can exercise their religious belief to deny their employees a health care benefit that they are guaranteed by law. The decision was 5-4 opinion which was decided by 1 vote difference. The case was also issued because many people were actually benefiting from the contraceptive coverage and they will have to face financial hardship with health care costs.
I believe the Supreme Court had made the right decision because the corporations are treated as persons, and if it is, it should have rights including religious freedom just like humans. The rights of religious freedom should extend to corporations under the statute’s definition of persons and its purpose to protect the right of those people. The corporations are composed of individuals and we use it to achieve our desired ends, hence the Religious Freedom Restoration Act should be applied to corporations. The owners of the company have religious belief and consider the contraception as abortion. Therefore, they should have right to object some part of health care coverage that violates their religious